Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone had any wise words to offer.


I live in a lovely flat in Nunhead and one of it's design features is massive, 13 foot wide windows at the back of the house and two huge skylights. While this looks lovely it means that, come the winter, the house is baltic (the sitting room is an extension, so all external walls). My flatmate and I can see our icy breath, even when the heating is on full blast, and all heating just evapourates through the windows anyway, costing us a small fortune. It's so bad we literally sit in the main living part of the house in gloves and hats.


My question is this: are landlords legally required to provide curtains or blinds? I am having to have curtains made and, combined with the cost of a rail, the whole things it going to cost me nigh on ?400 and the landlord is refusing to cover the cost of any of this.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13885-your-advice-landlord-problem/
Share on other sites

It a nutshell...NO. The Landlord is not obliged to provide these things. However since 1st October 2008 an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) must be made available free of charge to prospective tenants and a copy must be provided to all new Tenants. The certificates can only be produced by a Qualified and Accredited Domestic Energy Assessor (DEA) or a Home Inspector (HI). More info on these here


An Energy Performance Certificate is valid for up to ten years for rented properties. And grants are available for private landlords to help them improve things like insulation in their properties.


The 1987 ammendement to the housing act indicates what private landlords are required to provide/ maintain under the parametres of being 'fit for dwelling'. That covers legal obligations for things like gas and electric fittings and appliances.


Hope that helps.

I don't think a landlord is even obliged to provide heating - it depends what the contract says.

You would have viewed and chosen the property and had a set of questions to ask before moving in and some assumptions you may have made.


If the landlord is interested in retaining you as a tenant though he should at least try to be flexible, but that's his choice.

Put it this way, blinds curtains won't make too much difference if you're really wearing outdoor gear to survive in the flat. Next year will be the same, and the year after. If he tried to show the flat to prospective new tenants he'd surely (based on what you've said) have difficulties making the accomodation appear comfortable/cosy so perhaps it's worth giving your notice now and saying why. If he concedes perhaps you can negotiate an additional radiator or two in the cold part of the flat. If you threaten to move out he will know this may be a recurring problem for him every winter, for any tenant. The money he may lose trying to let it again may act as a driver for some change..


If you view alternative flats now you may be able to get a better picture of how well equipped they are for heating.


This is my opinion not gospel.

Landlords are required under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to:


1) Maintain water / gas / electricity supplies to the property


2) Provide facilities for water heating and space heating


This does not mean the Landlord has to necessarily provide gas or electricity - water and space heating could be bottled gas or a coal fire - but there does at least have to be some means to heat the property.

If you are sitting there shivering in gloves and hats, I don't think a few curtains will really improve things enough.


Sorry to state the obvious, but why not move somewhere else? No matter how much you like the flat, it's not worth it if you're freezing cold for half of the year.

Give notice on the flat and move out. There is no point being miserable at this time of year. No matter how nice your flat is in the spring/summer, it's not worth living like this now.


Good luck to your landlord for replacing you. Serves him right if he doesn't find someone until the spring.

Hi All,


Thanks for the excellent advice. The windows are double glazed but they are concertina doors so the heat gets out / cold gets in that way. I think heavy, lined curtains will make the world of difference.


After much pleading the landlord has agreed to pay for and put up a curtain rail, so good result all round!


HN


p..s it really is a lovely flat, wonderful features and decent rent, so not planning on going anywhere soon.

There are better ways to spend 400 quid.


Stop up any leaks around doors.


Insulating the walls with polystyrene on the walls and ceiling.


Add another layer of insulation in front of any glass by means of a product resembling the stuff which laminates photos etc, which sticks to the window and door frames available from any decent diy place.


All this will improve it but not eradicate the cold spot, unless the wall cavities and ceiling contain insulation.


The curtains will look nicer than anything I have suggested though.

Headnun, I really feel for you, my last flat was EXACTLY the same, and unfortunately I learnt the hard way that great design and decent rents are often just a way of covering up for shoddy workmanship on the actual house, which indicates a bad landlord. The flat I was in last was a whole house conversion into modern flats, brand new, looked nice, and rent was reasonable. Unfortunately it was very very badly insulated, despite what the Energy Performance Certificate said, and I could also see my breath. All flats were only provided with one electric heater which are ridiculously expensive and overheated after 5 minutes, cutting out. I eventually got the landlord to agree to me getting a proper oil filled radiator but I knew if I left it up to him I'd have never of got it so I said I'll buy it and take it off the next months rent.


I also called the local council to get someone to come out and check the flat, which took a while but it meant I could get a professional opinion and file a report/complaint. Private landlords ARE under obligation to the local council their properties come under.


Unfortunately, all of this took time and in the meantime it was the coldest winter for a long time- suffice to say I was completely miserable, and he report also took a long time to process, all the time my bills were sky high.


After 6 months I'd had enough and left, I only wished I'd done it sooner.


Your landlord sounds like a w***er, no decent landlord would let a property out that doesn't have decent insulation- if they wouldn't live in it why should you? Curtains are not going to make much difference, they'll make it feel psychologically more cosy but they won't keep out the cold.


I really really think you should hand in your notice and leave, before hardcore winter weather is upon us. It's so crappy but it will be worth it and you'll be so grateful when you remember what it feels like to be warm! Honestly, it's not worth the stress, the misery, and the high bills. Unfortunately, if it seems too good to be true, it usually is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...