Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Quids pre-dates me. 'Sfunny, but we

> didn't get on at all when I first started posting.

> Love him now, though. But then again I can say

> what I like, can't I, as he famously never reads

> this section.

>

> Tosser.

>

> Anyway, I'm a bit horrified I make the top 20...

> better rein in a bit!



*cough*

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Quids pre-dates me

>

> Only by a few days, Moos.

> Quids was really chippy and stroppy at first, but

> we made him love us (and admit he's middle-class)

> in the end. ;-)



Naaaaaaaah, Quids was semi-trolling at first methinks

Ah, I remember that thread well. Very funny it was too! Poor old Mick Mac - we were merciless and unrelenting in our piss-taking. If I recall correctly, did he not receive a tip off? In which case, were it not for that tip off, he'd probably as yet be none the wiser and we would (in all probability) still be laughing at his expense today. As I said, poor old Mick Mac LOL. I'll never forget the first time I met him. I took to him immediately. Unfortunately, I couldn't understand a word he said! His lips moved, and various sounds were emitted...but...




(*giggles mischievously*)

  • 2 weeks later...

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is the points thing you guys are always

> throwing ad hoc suddenly in a thread? What does

> 100 mean...or 3500? :))


Ad hoc!!! I really must protest! These are highly skilled and planned strikes - performed with military precision. It's the 100s Game (invented by Master Quids). You basically bank the hundredth post (or multiple thereof) by posting it - see here for a bit of insight into the game.

So roughly how many posts per day is this?



Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ok then, the top 19 are:

>

> Keef 12,445

> SeanMacGabhann 11,966

> Brendan 10,307

> Jah Lush 9,670

> mockney piers 9,363

> HonaloochieB 8,411

> ???? 8,102

> Peckhamgatecrasher 7,421

> *Bob* 6,140

> Sue 5,776

> Mick Mac 5,546

> SteveT 5,513

> KalamityKel 5,190

> Michael Palaeologus 4,946

> Jeremy 4,567

> Moos 4,560

> Ladymuck 4,392

> PeckhamRose 4,294

> woofmarkthedog 4,240

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
    • I agree there are other options, but apart from cutting off bits of the body, which is probably not going to happen here, at least hopefully not in my lifetime, I wouldn't call them"stricter"! Unfortunately ultimately it may depend on what is cost effective in terms of implementation.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...