Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Quids pre-dates me. 'Sfunny, but we

> didn't get on at all when I first started posting.

> Love him now, though. But then again I can say

> what I like, can't I, as he famously never reads

> this section.

>

> Tosser.

>

> Anyway, I'm a bit horrified I make the top 20...

> better rein in a bit!



*cough*

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Quids pre-dates me

>

> Only by a few days, Moos.

> Quids was really chippy and stroppy at first, but

> we made him love us (and admit he's middle-class)

> in the end. ;-)



Naaaaaaaah, Quids was semi-trolling at first methinks

Ah, I remember that thread well. Very funny it was too! Poor old Mick Mac - we were merciless and unrelenting in our piss-taking. If I recall correctly, did he not receive a tip off? In which case, were it not for that tip off, he'd probably as yet be none the wiser and we would (in all probability) still be laughing at his expense today. As I said, poor old Mick Mac LOL. I'll never forget the first time I met him. I took to him immediately. Unfortunately, I couldn't understand a word he said! His lips moved, and various sounds were emitted...but...




(*giggles mischievously*)

  • 2 weeks later...

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is the points thing you guys are always

> throwing ad hoc suddenly in a thread? What does

> 100 mean...or 3500? :))


Ad hoc!!! I really must protest! These are highly skilled and planned strikes - performed with military precision. It's the 100s Game (invented by Master Quids). You basically bank the hundredth post (or multiple thereof) by posting it - see here for a bit of insight into the game.

So roughly how many posts per day is this?



Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ok then, the top 19 are:

>

> Keef 12,445

> SeanMacGabhann 11,966

> Brendan 10,307

> Jah Lush 9,670

> mockney piers 9,363

> HonaloochieB 8,411

> ???? 8,102

> Peckhamgatecrasher 7,421

> *Bob* 6,140

> Sue 5,776

> Mick Mac 5,546

> SteveT 5,513

> KalamityKel 5,190

> Michael Palaeologus 4,946

> Jeremy 4,567

> Moos 4,560

> Ladymuck 4,392

> PeckhamRose 4,294

> woofmarkthedog 4,240

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
    • SMBs have the best organic porridge oats to make at home.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...