Jump to content

Can someone set up a petition banning self entitled urban guardianistas from setting up petitions?


Recommended Posts

Some people go out to work Lou, you know 'like they're mostly busy' so signing a petition 'feels' as if they're contributing. However, as you're pretty much idle most of the time, maybe you could go and picket Parliament on their behalf. You certainly have plenty of energy for a semi/retired lady.


Keep it local, I'll sponsor you with Cuppa-Soups, if that helps.


I reckon a few days on Goose Green Roundabout, with the rest on the green at Parliament could work.

The thing that's making me yawn most on the EDF at the moment Louisa is your continuous whining about the "urban liberal elite." For heaven's sake, you've shown many a time that you can make thoughtful and intelligent contributions to debate, why do you have to resort to just recycling the same tired old trope over and over (something which is nonsense anyway, as I've mentioned elsewhere, your continual insistence that Brexit is really the fault of those who voted against it, and Trump is the fault of those who voted for Hillary, as if the working class are some mass of mentally defective sheep who can't be trusted to make sensible decisions but only vote in opposition to the great demon liberal urban elite).


As for petitions, the one I signed is the one on the official government website which, having garnered more than a million signatures, means there has to be a debate on the issue in the Commons. It may not be much, but it's something.


If you want to set up a petition banning self-styled working class heroes from dismissing people, who are simply expressing their well-founded disquiet about the state of the world at present, as urban elite liberal guardianistas (what a witty term, never heard that one before!) then put me down for a signature.

Seabag, I think petitions tend to be set up by university students and a small clique of urban dwellers who thrive off of being seen to be outraged about things they don't necessarily understand. The UK is a parliamentary democracy, we have elections to air discontent with political elites. Any keyboard warrior can setup numerous email accounts and sign a petition in a matter of minutes and contribute towards the BBC putting up a headline that over a million people have signed a petition. What about the other 59 million (assuming every signature is one person, and that's questionable) who didn't sign a petition? If only it were so simplistic to suggest people work and want to contribute in any way they can. We don't know how many of the signatories work, nor will we ever find out.


If you're going to supply cuppa soups though mine is golden vegetable with a dry cream cracker.


Louisa.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The thing that's making me yawn most on the EDF at

> the moment Louisa is your continuous whining about

> the "urban liberal elite." For heaven's sake,

> you've shown many a time that you can make

> thoughtful and intelligent contributions to

> debate, why do you have to resort to just

> recycling the same tired old trope over and over

> (something which is nonsense anyway, as I've

> mentioned elsewhere, your continual insistence

> that Brexit is really the fault of those who voted

> against it, and Trump is the fault of those who

> voted for Hillary, as if the working class are

> some mass of mentally defective sheep who can't be

> trusted to make sensible decisions but only vote

> in opposition to the great demon liberal urban

> elite).

>

> As for petitions, the one I signed is the one on

> the official government website which, having

> garnered more than a million signatures, means

> there has to be a debate on the issue in the

> Commons. It may not be much, but it's something.

>

> If you want to set up a petition banning

> self-styled working class heroes from dismissing

> people, who are simply expressing their

> well-founded disquiet about the state of the world

> at present, as urban elite liberal guardianistas

> (what a witty term, never heard that one before!)

> then put me down for a signature.



I have to say rendelharris, when it comes to 'same tired old troupe', many many of the people on here who were so outraged by Brexit and the election of Trump have found numerous ways to disengage from the fact that either of those things happened, and that it remains business as usual. It's almost like, millions of people have voted for something but actually they didn't mean to do that, and those on the losing side can now shout louder and set up petitions and that will solve everything. Let me just be flippant here, it won't.


I've never said that those who voted against Brexit or Trump caused those things to happen, it's far more complex than that, as you know. I'd certainly say they contributed by not offering an alternative narrative to the right wing rhetoric which claimed to be the saviour of the working classes. You need to appreciate the frustration from the working classes, most are well informed and had their own reasons for voting the way they did, but surely if a centrist alternative were available they would have given that a go rather than turn to the right?


It's just as simplistic to conclude that the working classes are actually quite extreme and prejudiced and knew exactly what they were voting for. There's an element of that perhaps, as their is also the element that many voted the way they did because they genuinely thought it would bring about positive change for them and their families. Either way, we are where we are, and a million signatures on a dubious petition isn't going to change that any time soon.


Louisa.

Louisa said...'It's just as simplistic to conclude that the working classes are actually quite extreme and prejudiced and knew exactly what they were voting for'

I don't have to conclude anything about most of the 'liberal urban elite'- I KNOW that they are...'extreme and prejudiced and knew exactly what they were voting for...' to preserve the status quo- which they are doing very well out thank you very much....and the devil take the hindmost...that's charity for you

rendelharris Wrote:


> If you want to set up a petition banning

> self-styled working class heroes from dismissing

> people, who are simply expressing their

> well-founded disquiet about the state of the world

> at present, as urban elite liberal guardianistas

> (what a witty term, never heard that one before!)

> then put me down for a signature.


Completely agree rendelh. The 'metropolitan liberal elite' tag is driving me round the bend. Hackneyed. Simplistic. Divisive.

It's almost as hackneyed and simplistic as hearing wealthy London dwellers moaning about people from poor places using their democratic voice to vote for a political belief they find distasteful. Let's just ignore democracy shall we and sign a petition? That's going to solve everything.


The only reason wealthy London 'left wing' (dubious) types are so offended by the labels is because they ring true.


Louisa.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa said...'It's just as simplistic to conclude

> that the working classes are actually quite

> extreme and prejudiced and knew exactly what they

> were voting for'

> I don't have to conclude anything about most of

> the 'liberal urban elite'- I KNOW that they

> are...'extreme and prejudiced and knew exactly

> what they were voting for...' to preserve the

> status quo- which they are doing very well out

> thank you very much....and the devil take the

> hindmost...that's charity for you



I've asked you before, but please, in plain English could you inform me...


What does this actually mean? I've broken it down into bite size chunks, so you can copy and paste, then infill the gaps.


"I don't have to conclude anything about most of the 'liberal urban elite'-"



"I KNOW that they are...'extreme and prejudiced and knew exactly what they were voting for..."


"to preserve the status quo- which they are doing very well out thank you very much"



"....and the devil take the hindmost"



"...that's charity for you"



In anticipation


Thank you.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's almost as hackneyed and simplistic as hearing

> wealthy London dwellers moaning about people from

> poor places using their democratic voice to vote

> for a political belief they find distasteful.

> Let's just ignore democracy shall we and sign a

> petition? That's going to solve everything.

>

> The only reason wealthy London 'left wing'

> (dubious) types are so offended by the labels is

> because they ring true.

>

> Louisa.


It's fun on a not-much-to-to-day, to blather off with these tedious stereo types, to exercise your prejudices.


But it just switches people off, and that's counter productive, no?


Please try and engage creatively.


Or else post BLATHER BLATHER at the top of the post, so I can switch off accordingly.

These online petitions are way too easy.


10 actual signatures won by shoe leather and freezing afternoons at a trestle table on the high street are worth 100 keyboard warriors.


Let's start simple: petition to banish the infamous CCTV car. You've got the soup sorted; I'll bake some vegan brownies. Think I remember seeing a great recipe in the Guardian :)

tropespeak


The unassailable and probably Manga Carta given right to unashamedly take someone else's ideas that you read somewhere, sometime, somehow and then:


a) lazily repackage it into an offering that fits your preferred forum identity stance;

b) Go back to a) at every new opportunity

Borky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tropespeak

>

> The unassailable and probably Manga Carta given

> right to unashamedly take someone else's ideas

> that you read somewhere, sometime, somehow and

> then:

>

> a) lazily repackage it into an offering that fits

> your preferred forum identity stance;

> b) Go back to a) at every new opportunity



Where did you cut and paste that from? :)

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Let's just ignore democracy shall we and sign a

> petition? That's going to solve everything.


Part of being in a democracy is the right to protest, one avenue of expressing protest in the modern world of social media is to sign an online petition. Whether it actually solves anything misses the point. If you don't like democracy move to North Korea, they also have a dictator with a dodgy barnet...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Borky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > tropespeak

> >

> > The unassailable and probably Manga Carta given

> > right to unashamedly take someone else's ideas

> > that you read somewhere, sometime, somehow and

> > then:

> >

> > a) lazily repackage it into an offering that

> fits

> > your preferred forum identity stance;

> > b) Go back to a) at every new opportunity

>

>

> Where did you cut and paste that from? :)



I didn't.


And that is part of the problem.

Lots of affluent people voted for Brexit / Trump, Louisa. I had the pleasure of sitting next to one of them on Boxing Day. Oxford educated. London based. Middle class. And very happy to spout some pretty noxious views about Muslims. This really is a lot more complicated than them vs us, don't you think?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and part of living in a democracy is to be able

> point out the pointlessness and stupidity of such

> facile gestures on social media too :)


Absolutely Quids. Back in the day the then ageing, cynical 50-somethings probably thought the same about the ANL/RAR marches/gigs. Remember them?..;-)

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's almost as hackneyed and simplistic as

> hearing

> > wealthy London dwellers moaning about people

> from

> > poor places using their democratic voice to

> vote

> > for a political belief they find distasteful.

> > Let's just ignore democracy shall we and sign a

> > petition? That's going to solve everything.

> >

> > The only reason wealthy London 'left wing'

> > (dubious) types are so offended by the labels

> is

> > because they ring true.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> It's fun on a not-much-to-to-day, to blather off

> with these tedious stereo types, to exercise your

> prejudices.

>

> But it just switches people off, and that's

> counter productive, no?

>

> Please try and engage creatively.

>

> Or else post BLATHER BLATHER at the top of the

> post, so I can switch off accordingly.



It's counter productive to exercise my Democratic right to question a pointless and lazy exercise in social media protest? If you say so. Many of us have switched off listening to repeatitive post and thread after the other, babbling on about the virtues of signing a pretty unimaginative petition, achieving nothing, rather than looking at the reasons why people voted the way they did, and why that contributed towards these odious people being put into power in the first place. Very much after the horse has bolted mentality about the whole thing. And to add insult to injury, the denial of recognition about that very fact. Yep, I am Using my Democratic right to question the point of a social media protest, next.. care to add anything constructive?


Louisa.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > and part of living in a democracy is to be able

> > point out the pointlessness and stupidity of

> such

> > facile gestures on social media too :)

>

> Absolutely Quids. Back in the day the then ageing,

> cynical 50-somethings probably thought the same

> about the ANL/RAR marches/gigs. Remember

> them?..;-)


But they involved going along and in some cases actually meeting people who disagreed with you and were more likely to express that disagreement physically. Signing petitions piece of pointless piss. Calling someone a wanker for reading Bulldog at West ham in the 80s took a bit more balls.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
    • Looks great! but could it be possible to pinch the frames a bit tighter with some long nose pliers and add more struts to stop the tree rats getting inside? Also, the only issue with a mesh base is that it could attract rats towards your property.
    • I struggled with the parakeets literally decimating the bird feeders within an hour.  I tried squirrel proof ones to see if they helped, but they jammed their claws in the mechanism to stop it closing.  Then the pigeons managed to do the same.  I spent a long time researching the best ideas and came across something on Pinterest.  Someone had used a metal dog cage and attached it to a wooden platform.  So that's what I did!  Once set up, you just hang the feeders inside.  Large birds like pigeons and parakeets cannot get inside.  I get all the small birds, plus starlings.  Not many thrushes or blackbirds around, so have no idea if they could get in.  The squirrels do!  It's amazing watching them slide through narrow gaps.  I also covered the roof of the cage with a piece of plastic to keep the rain off, plus I am just about to replace the cage plastic base with something more mesh like.  It can get a bit gooey after a while, so with mesh, all the dropped seed from the messy goldfinches, will go on to the ground where the pigeons can clear up.  I even added a birdcam.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...