Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rainbows do not actually exist.


They are an Optical Illusion caused by a Prismatic effect of the sunlight on raindrops.


Rainbows viewed from High Altitude Aircraft can be seen as complete Circles.


So sadly they do not have Ends and hence no 'Pot of Gold' :(


Nice Pics though. ;-)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rainbows do not actually exist.

>

> They are an Optical Illusion caused by a Prismatic

> effect of the sunlight on raindrops.

>

> Rainbows viewed from High Altitude Aircraft can be

> seen as complete Circles.

>

> So sadly they do not have Ends and hence no 'Pot

> of Gold' :(

>

> Nice Pics though. ;-)



Hey thanks for that DulwichFox - could you make sure you pop round on xmas eve and give my kids the hard facts about Mr Claus?


;-)

Lol, Keef and legalbeagle.


We saw the double rainbow from the front of a bus on the way to Deptford, and at one point the end of the main bow appeared to be over Canary Wharf.


Was amazing how it got brighter and brighter.


I love rainbows :) Would like to have seen it over East Dulwich, so thanks for the pix!

legalbeagle Wrote:

-----------------------

> Hey thanks for that DulwichFox - could you make

> sure you pop round on xmas eve and give my kids

> the hard facts about Mr Claus?

>

> ;-)


No Problem.


Should I explain about Tooth Fairies as well. ;-)


Trouble is, Who does eat the Mince Pie and drink the Sherry. ?


Where does the Sixpence under the pillow come from. ?

I did think the rainbow was beautiful, hence my earlier posting. However I don't think doubble or even triple rainbows are that unusual-if you look carefully they are often there. However I think this one was brighter than usual, perhaps because the quality of the light and the placing of the dark clouds
In truth light is white, but when refraction of light in water takes place, the human eye perceives the entire gamut of colours.


This is completely incorrect. Just because it's on the internet doesn't make it true.


Different colours are just different frequencies of light. The water vapour disperses the coloured components of white light at different angles. There is no illusion.

Some people believe that Rainbows have magical healing properties, and it is said that faith healers use the colours of the rays separately to heal different ailments. Even the pharmaceutical company's believe this to be true and colour their medicines accordingly. It is also believed that a rainbow is sent by god to help ease the pain and suffering and happens after tragic incidents.


I don't believe any of this mumbo jumbo myself.


Jacko.

Oh dear, this has become mumbo jumbo couched in unreasonable deductions based on experiential evidence.


Jeremy is quite right, our Basque friends do not have the inside story on rainbows. Refraction does bend light waves of different frequencies by different degrees. A rainbow is not an illusion. Blue light, with it's smaller wavelength will be bent (scattered) more than longer wavelength red light. It's the same reason the sky is blue (all that blue light scattered all over the place) and sunsets are red (because all of the shorter wavelength colours have been scattered by traveling through so much atmosphere leaving just the red to travel to your eye).


Pills have a different colour not because colours are 'healing' but because the mind responds differently to colour signals that are entirely natural in their provenance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...