Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just met a couple who both work at Sainsburys East Dulwich. Dog Kennel Hill. As well as a recent post she told me a poodle was stolen the same day, and a Weimaraner was stolen a week or so ago. Clearly an easy target. Let's not always blame the owners? Let's blame the people that steal shall we? Also be aware when we go there.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okkkkay so we're back to blaming the victim.


It is not a Question of blaming the victim... Leaving your pet tied up outside a shop cruel.

Dogs get very distressed when left like that and doing so shows a total disreguard of your pet's welfare.


The Dog may appear abandoned.. A child might try and stroke the distressed dog and get bitten.

This practise needs to be made illegal and the owner fined..


DulwichFox

Am not blaming any victims, that person that left the dog like that in 2017 is no victim... is a fool person. Its like saying oh why are you blaming a man that his house got robbed while he left his front door wide open... There is no victim here, just a fool person.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Leaving your pet tied up outside a shop cruel.

> Dogs get very distressed when left like that and

> doing so shows a total disreguard of your pet's

> welfare.


Some dogs may become distressed, but not all. And the ones that do are equally likely to be distressed if you leave them home alone. Whereas bringing the hound with you to the shops is healthy for both owner and Fido. Sorry DF but you're over-generalising, and many dogs will contentedly wait for their owner when told to do so.



> A child might try and stroke the distressed dog and get bitten.

> This practise needs to be made illegal and the owner fined.


Dogs biting people IS illegal. The owner can be fined, among other consequences. If the dog might bite, the owner is responsible for keeping it under control and if necessary muzzling it. It's equally perfectly fine for the owner of a sedate, tame Labrador or somesuch to judge that the dog will behave itself if left leashed outside the shops. No need to go all Big Brother and make up unnecessary rules to deal with the 1% of idiots who are liable to let their packs of attack dogs roam rampant.

Dogs outside Gail's in the Village, tied up to shiver and yelp and yap whilst "mummy" is warm and cosy inside, are a perennial pain. I don't think dogs should be left tied up anywhere where the owner can't keep an eye on it: just organise your life to not have to take your pet with you everywhere.

I hope dogs and owners are reconciled because losing a pet is not nice at all.

For those of you blaming dog owners, would you be supportive of dogs coming into food shops & cafes? It's better to take a dog out and keep it exercised, and occasionally that means a dog will have to wait where society doesn't allow dogs indoors. It's not cruel to leave a dog outside for a few minutes while you do your shopping (weather permitting).

No. No need to take the dog anywhere other than for exercise which means no shops or cafes or tying it up. Take responsibility for your dog and kids. Simple. Organise your life and stop imposing on others.


charlie.gl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For those of you blaming dog owners, would you be

> supportive of dogs coming into food shops & cafes?

> It's better to take a dog out and keep it

> exercised, and occasionally that means a dog will

> have to wait where society doesn't allow dogs

> indoors. It's not cruel to leave a dog outside for

> a few minutes while you do your shopping (weather

> permitting).

Zelig Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No. No need to take the dog anywhere other than

> for exercise which means no shops or cafes or

> tying it up. Take responsibility for your dog and

> kids. Simple. Organise your life and stop imposing

> on others.

>


No!

seriously. how many of you are dog owners/lovers on this thread.


think about this...


I take my dog for a walk in the park. On the way back, I realise I need some milk. I tie the dog up outside the shop as I HAVE NO OPTION TO TAKE THE DOG IN. The dog gets stolen. Then it would be MY fault for leaving my dog outside for 5mins?


I would love to take my dog in but so many shops are hostile. I tried to take her into the Post Office and was told to leave her outside (btw there is nowhere to tie your dog up outside unless you want them to get run over by a bus) so I had to leave. So instead of taking my dog out on fun jaunts these days, she has to sit at home bored as hell. Something's not right.


More dog love please.

Dogs in food shops/ restaurants? No thank you.

There's nothing wrong with leaving dogs outside, briefly. Although you would think people would realise the stress a busy street would cause a dog.


It is shocking though that people will just untether your dog and walk off with it.

Just as it is people grabbing your phone, robbing your houses, slashing your tyres....


There's a very serious pattern of bad behaviour in ED so it would just be wise to not provide an opportunity.


It's very very stupid to do so, knowing the pattern of behaviour locally.

Nobody "needs" to go to a cafe at all. It's really no different to someone sitting in a cafe reading a book, listening to music, or chatting with friends. To suggest that a dog owner should only take their dog out the house to exercise it is complete nonsense. I have a dog because I enjoy spending my leisure time with her and so I do take her most places I go. She doesn't cause any ill effect on anyone.
I've never really understood the rationale for keeping (well behaved) dogs out of caf?s - my family have always had dogs wandering in and out of the kitchen and nobody's ever suffered any ill effects from them, and in pubs it's usually delightful to see how most people love having a dog around and make a fuss of it. I don't think it's victim blaming though to say I'd never leave a dog tied up outside a shop round here, any more than I'd leave an unattended small child, there are just too many odd characters about who might set it loose, walk away with it etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
    • I think the accusation derives from the Greens mobilising the Muslim vote, hence engaging in sectarian politics. But happy to be corrected    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...