Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > SMG is right, I know it seems like we're taxed

> to

> > the hilt sometimes, but our tax is not really

> high

> > by european standards.

> >

>

> Aye. I'm also with the Gabba on that general view,

> in terms of both personal and business taxation.

> Last year we looked carefully at potentially

> relocating our business elsewhere and, after

> taking a large number of factors into account, the

> only places that ranked higher than the UK were

> New Zealand and Singapore. And they clearly

> wouldnt work for us. People moan about small

> business red tape but the reality is that tax is

> relatively very low, with allowances for

> entrepreneurial relief at 10% on capital gains

> etc. This is a great country to do business.


Why, then, do so many small businesses go under each week if Britain is a great place to do business? Why are there so many shops closed in our high streets with few or no takers? I know many people who have small businesses, and they don't share your view.



You mean businesses don't close down in other countries? Man I gotta get me some of that action


Detroit - USA


http://assets.espn.go.com/i/eticket/20090430/photos/etick_bing16_850.jpg


Joburg


http://images.visualeditors.com/apple/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/091018joburgstreetone.jpg

Nice CXC, cheers, You've called me dunce, and flipped me the bird.


I am very protective towards students


You clearly are, but how can you be prtective of all students? Surely university students represent a very wide cross section of society, with different ideas, and ideologies. In which case, you must disagree with some of them.


I basically agree with the sentiment behind this march. I disagree with some of them smashing stuff up.

oh yes I forgot t say Keef...

it's pretty hard for me to "chill out" when everything I have worked for over the last 15th years is about to be flushed down the pan thanks to the bankers and a greedy society driven materiel values...

what did we (teaching staff) do wrong???


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/44/111730567_0e49c02f7e.jpg

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Businesses closing down and starting up is also

> often a sign of a business friendly environment.

> Small businesses fail, it ain't a free ride


We are all aware of that, but thanks to both you and Sean McGabbhan for the patronising responses. Speaking as someone that has had 3 businesses, I am well aware of the pitfalls, but equally I don't kid myself that we live in some kind of entrepreneurial paradise. I'm offering the flip side of your view.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> But isn't that what "we" do when we elect a

> government - without that premise there is no

> unified "we"


yes, but unfortunately no-one ever seems happy with how any government allocates the budget. i didn't vote for this government but even if i did - allocating taxes this way seems appealingly democratic and gives the individual and the 'we' a much stronger voice. (all this said knowing the idea itself is not sustainable). BUT lets say i thought students were a load of tossers and didn't deserve my tax pound i might soon find myself forced into a higher argument with myself - do i really want to live a society with badly qualified doctors, nurses, teachers etc... and then, as i hear so many people say, also on this thread, i would start to properly understand the value of funding as a society something that at first glance does not seem to pertain directly to me.


i bet under a system like this (makey-up) one, education and health would do better than under any government.


the banks probably wouldn't fare so well though...


* edited because i spelt education wrong.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why, then, do so many small businesses go under

> each week if Britain is a great place to do

> business?

>

> I'm answering that, so if in all honesty you want

> to opine and don't want your questions answered

> why put them up eh?


That was what you call an answer eh? Well if thats the level of answer I'm going to get, I'm wondering if its worth while. Your answer was flippant at best, and lazy at worst.

"it's pretty hard for me to "chill out" when everything I have worked for over the last 15th years is about to be flushed down the pan"


Even after the proposed cuts in funding there will be far more students in HE than there were 15 years ago. Precious little to do with bankers or materialism - just less money coming in in taxes and big debts to pay off, so every area of the public sector takes a hit. Universities are not immune - why should they be?

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That was not the premise of Mr Ben's post....he

> clearly makes the point that good old fashioned

> rioting is stirring.

>

> Surely not?



Fair enough.


Busting up office buildings aside though I do find it heartening that they are taking an active interest and that being involved now is forcing them take notice and think about how things work and what sort of world they want to leave behind. Compared to the apathetic, capitulating, apolitical consumers that I went to university with it is actually quite refreshing.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh go and get a thicker skin Atila, I mean

> Emerson. It was an answer, it's a Forum. Haven't

> seen that much fact in your arguments.


Who is Atila, please let me know. As for facts, I've not seen many in your own argument. "It's a forum". Talk about state the flipping blatantly obvious. As I said previously, I've had 3 businesses, one of which I sold at a profit one went under as a result of the recession in the early nineties and one is still going but suffering, as I'm sure many are. I've never found the banks, taxation, or for that matter local authorities helpul to my businesses and therefore speak from experience. I'm aware its my choice, but lets have a balance eh?

OliviaDee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yes, but unfortunately no-one ever seems happy

> with how any government allocates the budget. i

> didn't vote for this government but even if i did

> - allocating taxes this way seems appealingly

> democratic and gives the individual and the 'we' a

> much stronger voice. (all this said knowing the

> idea itself is not sustainable). BUT lets say i

> thought students were a load of tossers and didn't

> deserve my tax pound i might soon find myself

> forced into a higher argument with myself - do i

> really want to live a society with badly qualified

> doctors, nurses, teachers etc... and then, as i

> hear so many people say, also on this thread, i

> would start to properly understand the value of

> funding as a society something that at first

> glance does not seem to pertain directly to me.

>

> i bet under a system like this (makey-up) one,

> education and health would do better than under

> any government.

>

> the banks probably wouldn't fare so well

> though...

>

> * edited because i spelt education wrong.


Olivia - an interesting idea. The trouble is that I barely trust vast swathes of the population to leave the house in the morning with their pants on the right way round.


I have enough trouble allowing these people to vote let alone have direct control of fiscal allocation. All the money would be spent on Facebook causes and the Richard & Judy book club.

oh you know him Emerson


Arsenal fan


runs small businesses


Denies he is Atila repeatedly


The one who posted on teh Nunhead forum, realised there was noone there and so invented a new name (again)


have a look in a mirror


We all know it's you, why don't you?

david_carnell Wrote:


> Olivia - an interesting idea. The trouble is that

> I barely trust vast swathes of the population to

> leave the house in the morning with their pants on

> the right way round.

>

> I have enough trouble allowing these people to

> vote let alone have direct control of fiscal

> allocation. All the money would be spent on

> Facebook causes and the Richard & Judy book club.


i know david - of course this is true. the only problem is that i don't actually trust the government much more.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dunno

>

> Arsenal Fan

> Connections with Dulwich Hamlet

> Seemed to take it as a personal affront when

> poeple didn't agree with his opinions

>

> DID used to shout and swear more than you...you

> been on anger magmt courses?



The first two also true of me, but as I'm not this person I can't answer for him. I personally have no problem with differing opinions, but I've simply stated my view which differs from the one put forward by others and asked for balance. I don't think that is an unreasonable request.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OliviaDee Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > yes, but unfortunately no-one ever seems happy

> > with how any government allocates the budget. i

> > didn't vote for this government but even if i

> did

> > - allocating taxes this way seems appealingly

> > democratic and gives the individual and the 'we'

> a

> > much stronger voice. (all this said knowing the

> > idea itself is not sustainable). BUT lets say i

> > thought students were a load of tossers and

> didn't

> > deserve my tax pound i might soon find myself

> > forced into a higher argument with myself - do

> i

> > really want to live a society with badly

> qualified

> > doctors, nurses, teachers etc... and then, as i

> > hear so many people say, also on this thread, i

> > would start to properly understand the value of

> > funding as a society something that at first

> > glance does not seem to pertain directly to me.

>

> >

> > i bet under a system like this (makey-up) one,

> > education and health would do better than under

> > any government.

> >

> > the banks probably wouldn't fare so well

> > though...

> >

> > * edited because i spelt education wrong.

>

> Olivia - an interesting idea. The trouble is that

> I barely trust vast swathes of the population to

> leave the house in the morning with their pants on

> the right way round.

>

> I have enough trouble allowing these people to

> vote let alone have direct control of fiscal

> allocation. All the money would be spent on

> Facebook causes and the Richard & Judy book club.



Aggh the voice of a true socialist, knowing what's best for the plebby proles

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Olivia - an interesting idea. The trouble is that

> I barely trust vast swathes of the population to

> leave the house in the morning with their pants on

> the right way round.

>

> I have enough trouble allowing these people to

> vote let alone have direct control of fiscal

> allocation. All the money would be spent on

> Facebook causes and the Richard & Judy book club.


Is this your formal opinion as a Party member?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...