Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think motive is an issue here. If the

> Government genuinely wishes to help the unemployed

> back into work by making them feel socially useful

> and training them etc., then fine. However, if

> this is about demeaning or punishing so-called

> scroungers or malingerers, then I am not

> comfortable with that.



But I'm agreeing with you LadyMuck, this is exactly my point too. and so is DJKQ

>

>

> @#$%& @#$%& @#$%& @#$%& (because Brendan says we

> can)

Oh bless you zeban...I wasn't having a go at you at all...


No no no no no no...


I was being facetious with the Queen...in respect of her Majesty's comment: "I absolutely agree with every word..."


Nothing to do with anything YOU said...LOL!


I agree with much of what you have said, bye the way.


Apologies for any confusion.

And Ladymuck will be thrown out of court soon enough...where she'll have to work in a pig sty to feed herself rather than the life she enjoys swanning around the castle gossiping with the other laides in waiting.....;-)
This is all rather reminiscent of a policy from the dying days of the Major government. Imaginatively entitled "Project Work", an experiment was conducted in the Medway Towns and Hull, into getting the long term unemployed (more than 2 years) back into work. Intensive one to one help was given for 13 weeks, followed by a period of compulsory work experience. It was considered to have been a success by the government and was due to be rolled out across the country, then they lost the election.
I think most people forced into this position, would rather go and do cash in hand jobs, pay no taxes and generally slide out of the system and live like old wartime spivs. A few years ago the eastern block people were being picked up as cheap labour on London streets, most even helped to build the Dome. There are even children used as slave labour in the fields.Tax lost is not a good idea. But neither is reducing people to doing menial jobs. Even the prisoners in our jails aare not treated like that. They used to make things for society, now they play games.? How can you take food and comfort away from children.,if their parents refuse to work for peanuts.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how it works now but my late parents had little money when they were retired (just state pension and they rented their flat) and they used to take their cat to the Blue Cross (In Victoria if I remember correctly) where treatment was free for those who could'nt afford a private vet. I sincerely hope similar is available still because for many elderly their pet is their main source of comfort and company.  
    • In a couple of places locally, I have come across this. I am fairly sure that they attempt to do the bill in their head. If you just say , “no, I think it’s x” they start again and get to an agreeable number, or find a calculator. I don’t think it’s a malicious attempt to swindle people. Just not great arithmetic.
    • There are excellent charities like the Greenwich Wildlife Network who will help if you report any concerns with local wildlife. Foxes are wonderful creatures who had been forced into our town and cities and are just doing their best to survive, we should take care of them when we can. 
    • Like I thought… prob like that for most of the day.. especially after people had walked their dogs, with friends, relatives  kids… 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...