Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think motive is an issue here. If the

> Government genuinely wishes to help the unemployed

> back into work by making them feel socially useful

> and training them etc., then fine. However, if

> this is about demeaning or punishing so-called

> scroungers or malingerers, then I am not

> comfortable with that.



But I'm agreeing with you LadyMuck, this is exactly my point too. and so is DJKQ

>

>

> @#$%& @#$%& @#$%& @#$%& (because Brendan says we

> can)

Oh bless you zeban...I wasn't having a go at you at all...


No no no no no no...


I was being facetious with the Queen...in respect of her Majesty's comment: "I absolutely agree with every word..."


Nothing to do with anything YOU said...LOL!


I agree with much of what you have said, bye the way.


Apologies for any confusion.

And Ladymuck will be thrown out of court soon enough...where she'll have to work in a pig sty to feed herself rather than the life she enjoys swanning around the castle gossiping with the other laides in waiting.....;-)
This is all rather reminiscent of a policy from the dying days of the Major government. Imaginatively entitled "Project Work", an experiment was conducted in the Medway Towns and Hull, into getting the long term unemployed (more than 2 years) back into work. Intensive one to one help was given for 13 weeks, followed by a period of compulsory work experience. It was considered to have been a success by the government and was due to be rolled out across the country, then they lost the election.
I think most people forced into this position, would rather go and do cash in hand jobs, pay no taxes and generally slide out of the system and live like old wartime spivs. A few years ago the eastern block people were being picked up as cheap labour on London streets, most even helped to build the Dome. There are even children used as slave labour in the fields.Tax lost is not a good idea. But neither is reducing people to doing menial jobs. Even the prisoners in our jails aare not treated like that. They used to make things for society, now they play games.? How can you take food and comfort away from children.,if their parents refuse to work for peanuts.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had a great experience with Paul. He sorted out a lighting issue we had very efficiently and I would highly recommend him! https://www.checkatrade.com/trades/edgleycontracting382245
    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...