Jump to content

sweep your own leaves, clean your own ice and snow: saving the council money balancing the budget


Recommended Posts

At the Community Council Meeting on 10 November at St Faith's we were told Southwark has to cut 80 million from its budget. But where? What if we make East Dulwich a trial, a model for community (tiny) action that saves mega bucks? If every one sweeps the leaves and clears the ice and snow from the 8 metres in front of their property the council would save up to 10 million pounds. Yes, you read that correctly: 10 million if everyone did it. Seems a small action to me to save a lot of money. In an entire year it might take one hour? two?. No leaf blowers, no trucks. 10 million saved.

I also think alot of money could be saved in a revamp of the Parking Authority (see my gripe about a ticket for a questionable offence): Pay and display and the High Street only. And what about a complete revamp of Building and Development? There must be millions to be saved, standards to be raised and loads of world quality apprentices to train.

Comments?

What if we went one further and made East Dulwich a Transition Town?

Where did you get the "up to 10 million" figure from, was it from the meeting? I persnaly can't see it taking off enough and there would need to be a shed load of money spent to advertise this so people knew they had to. Also, the road sweepers would lose their jobs :(


I am happy with the parking we have at the moment as I think pay and display would clog up the side roads even more and I don't want residents parking but that's just me.


Those are of course just my views and I do realise that the money needs to be cut somewhere, I just don't know where.


My boyfriend works for Southwark building services and his job is most certainly under threat, if not a substantial pay cut and we would then struggle to pay our mortgage.


I have no answers or solutions to offer so in a way my post is a bit pointless - sorry!

Great idea and no problem doing it but my street has quite a lot of older people living on it. Would they be expected to clear up? If they don't then how will it work with half the street clear and the rest not?


Already we have kind residents ignoring fallen fruit littering the front of their house and the road for the entire late summer/autumn and the stench is horrific. The residents (two young couples) have not cleared up and neither have the council.


I would definitely prefer the council to save money on these types of services rather than on essential social services but there are definitely some holes in the idea.

We need to be told how to do everything!


Is there a code on how to sweep leaves?

I had a reply from the council about why they're using petrol driven hand held leaf blowers. Basically, it is to save money because lots of humans using brooms would cost them more.


So that's okay then.

So I presume more people would be made unemployed by this thus money would have to be spent supporting them and their families? Correct me if I'm wrong.


Edited to add that of course this would create jobs so people could monitor the unemployed and make sure they are not claiming benefits they shouldn't be.

Hi PeckhamRose,

The Snow code highlights good practice to clear snow from pavements and paths such that you can avoid being successfully sued - which is a commonly given reason for people saying why they haven't cleared the pavement outside their home.


Hi Narnia,

Their will never be enough council employees to clear all pavements outside homes - hundreds of kilometres of pavements.

But if residents clear the pavement outside their home the effects of the snow would be dramatically reduced. This really helps reduce peoples isolation.

ataubin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At the Community Council Meeting on 10 November at

> St Faith's we were told Southwark has to cut 80

> million from its budget. But where? What if we

> make East Dulwich a trial, a model for community

> (tiny) action that saves mega bucks? If every one

> sweeps the leaves and clears the ice and snow from

> the 8 metres in front of their property the

> council would save up to 10 million pounds. Yes,

> you read that correctly: 10 million if everyone

> did it. Seems a small action to me to save a lot

> of money. In an entire year it might take one

> hour? two?. No leaf blowers, no trucks. 10

> million saved.

> I also think alot of money could be saved in a

> revamp of the Parking Authority (see my gripe

> about a ticket for a questionable offence): Pay

> and display and the High Street only. And what

> about a complete revamp of Building and

> Development? There must be millions to be saved,

> standards to be raised and loads of world quality

> apprentices to train.

> Comments?

> What if we went one further and made East Dulwich

> a Transition Town?


Considering the amount of council tax we pay I personally wont be sweeping any leaves or clearing ice from the streets or taking part in any other activity that is supposedly covered by my paying of council tax.

Hurrah for clearing snow - yes - as an ex-New Englander it is something I've always done. The advantage to people doing it themselves is it can often be addressed at the time it is easiest to move it - just after it falls, and, before it is packed down with foot traffic. Everyone would voluntarily help the elderly with clearance, and, enterprising young children would often make a bit of pocket money from other houses who chose to hire someone...and, nostalgically, there was a warm bit of neighborhood camaraderie in the morning after a snowfall...

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So I presume more people would be made unemployed

> by this thus money would have to be spent

> supporting them and their families? Correct me if

> I'm wrong.

>

> Edited to add that of course this would create

> jobs so people could monitor the unemployed and

> make sure they are not claiming benefits they

> shouldn't be.


Absolutely agree Narnia. Road sweeping is a very low paid job so the saving to the taxpayer in overall cost between someone working or not working (they are unlikely to find work in the private sector at present) is insignificant so lets keep them in work.


Make cuts of middle or high earners in council services, not at the bottom

Considering the amount of council tax we pay I personally wont be sweeping any leaves or clearing ice from the streets or taking part in any other activity that is supposedly covered by my paying of council tax


But if we all did our bit in sweeping leaves, clearing snow etc that can be regarded as a physical, non financial, contribution to the local area that avoids an increase in local taxes. As an added benefit we might get to know our neighbours, help out th elderly who were unable to sweep / clear and perhaps as an added bonus everyone would take a little more civic pride intheir immediate vicinity.


Leaving the proverbial / anecdotal "them" to do it is, to my mind, a deriliction of public duty - regardless of the level of council tax.

My neighbour has a public tree growing in the pavement, she always sweeps the leaves from her frontage onto mine, not trying to collect them for disposal, she does the same with the snow.

When a bus passes the leaves get spread again, and the snow that gets piled into the curb by her gets melted and spewed over my frontage.

Nice lady has a face front and back.

The sort community-minded people who would clear up their own snow/leaves etc most probably already do so. Excluding those who are unable to wield a shovel, the rest would appear to prefer to run the risk of breaking an arm/leg during the daily slip-slide to and from the house to spending a little time dealing with it themselves BECAUSE that's what they pay their Council Tax for. Crazy but true, folks.
A lot of people on my street already sweep leaves from outside their house, we do it from ours once a week. I don't recall the council shifting any of the snow from our pavements last year though, the roads, yes but pavements no. So not really sure what's being gained out of 'everybody' doing it..

I don't think the council ever sweeps leaves or clears snow in this road (though we do get the gritter lorries when appropriate). Even our pavements are looking more than a little ropey after endless utilities digging over the last quarter century filled with random tarmac.


I'm in favour of people clearing their own leaves and snow.

Are we going to be issued with a community broom for each street? :)

Many flat-dwellers don't have the heavy-duty outdoor variety.

Snap.


I don't mean to be unhelpful but I own neither broom nor shovel (dustpan and brush aside). Having traversed the mulchy leaves in frippantly high heels, I know this is a task that needs doing, but I'm afraid my tools are not fit for purpose.

I'm a flat dweller and since our communal garden has a large tree, we bought (as a group) a relatively cheap brush/rake to use on both the 'garden' and the pavement. A brush is hardly expensive (it's not like insisting on a large powered leafblower) and snow shovels can be had for a few pounds. You'd get both brush and shovel for well under ?10


One thing on snow-clearing though is what happens with grit. My family still live in Scotland where there are grit 'skips' every few hundred metres and it's quite common for people to clear the pavement in front of their homes of snow. The council fill the grit bins and then residents grab a bucket (also fairly cheap) to carry some home for the pavement and drive. Do we have grit bins down here?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...