Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Ranata and Cass

There was a thread on here a while ago which I started but I can't find it now.

There was a planning application to build a supermarket and several flats above on the site where the vets, estate agent and barbers are currently. The planning application was withdrawn but will probably be revised and resubmitted. That corner needs improving, but I felt that it was an overdevelopment of the site.

solar Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Ranata and Cass

> There was a thread on here a while ago which I

> started but I can't find it now.

> There was a planning application to build a

> supermarket and several flats above on the site

> where the vets, estate agent and barbers are

> currently. The planning application was withdrawn

> but will probably be revised and resubmitted. That

> corner needs improving, but I felt that it was an

> overdevelopment of the site.




http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1550211,page=1

When I asked the manager at the Neighbourhood vets last year if they were moving due to redevelopment of the site he said definitely not however they are moving to Lordship Lane in the next few weeks so there we have it. It's a little bit further for us on foot down busier roads but still very close by so not too bad.
  • 2 years later...

brownie17 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love animals and the search gave me this thread.

> I'm sorry for touching your feelings.


Oh, so you're not a spammer? Just a fan of coming onto a local South London forum recommending a) Singaporean air condition servicing; b) sleep headphones for sale in the US only and c) cat scratchers? Please. Just take it somewhere else.

I?m glad to see one of these nuisance spammers engaging with the forum. Tell us, how much do you get paid for posting these links and why do you bother when you?re targetting a geographical market who wouldn?t be interested in the products/services you?re advertising?
  • Administrator

Sorry, we didn't see this spammer. I won't ban them just yet as I'm interested to see if they reply but I will remove their spammy posts.


We seem to be getting a lot of spammers these days, please do report them (just one per spammer) and we'll get to them asap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had a great experience with Paul. He sorted out a lighting issue we had very efficiently and I would highly recommend him! https://www.checkatrade.com/trades/edgleycontracting382245
    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...