Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beej Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sods law, after all the talk of the place this

> week I was planning to finally give it a try on

> Tuesday and again tonight, cest a vie.... good job

> I can never get enough of that weirdly trippy

> drippy hypnotic oil lamp thing in East Dulwich

> Tandoori.


That trippy drippy hypnotic oil lamp thing in Dulwich Tandoori Has been there for 20 years+ ??


It broke down but was repaired s couple of years back.


DulwichFox

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was told by another restaurant that they owned 3

> others and they all closed on the same day.

> Bob S


Draw your own conclusions. I've been told that this was a police raid, not an immigration raid. But of course Foxy & Louisa are quite correct that we should await any criminal charges before drawing any conclusions. And further comment on here could potentially be defamatory (apart from the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both ongoing and enjoyable). Enough said.

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


(apart from

> the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both

> ongoing and enjoyable).



It isn't ongoing.


I just wanted an answer, and I got it, so as far as I'm concerned that is the end of it.


I just don't understand why it wasn't forthcoming earlier, as it seemed a quite straightforward explanation.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> derwentgrove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> (apart from

> > the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both

> > ongoing and enjoyable).

>

>

> It isn't ongoing.

>

> I just wanted an answer, and I got it, so as far

> as I'm concerned that is the end of it.

>

> I just don't understand why it wasn't forthcoming

> earlier, as it seemed a quite straightforward

> explanation.


Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you should know that by now ;-)


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you should

> know that by now ;-)

>



Well I am straightforward, so I presume you are speaking for yourself?


ETA: And perhaps for Dulwich Fox if you are implying that his explanation wasn't in fact all that it seemed?


Oh well, I always was very gullible :(

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you

> should

> > know that by now ;-)

> >

>

>

> Well I am straightforward, so I presume you are

> speaking for yourself?



I am very straightforward too. It's often my downfall. You know as well as I do, Foxy sometimes goes off on a tangent, innocently and never offensively, and yet you goad him for answers when it isn't necessarily needed. That's my conclusion, but anyway let's drop it now.


Louisa.

ozzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A guy from there told me they were re-opening on

> march 16th selling indian food .


Thank god; we've needed a decent Indian on LL for ages. All we need now is a pizza place, cheese shop and some banners on lampposts and we're set.

> Ianr yes I was told the same.


Bob, I was quoting you and simply asking: which of A or B?


Anyway, for anyone inclined to fact-check the rumour of simultaneous closures ... The sole director/owner of Xoco Ltd of 44LL, incorporated March 2016, has the same name and birth month as the person who took over Chutney Jane Ltd of London SE, another restaurant business, in September 2015. So possibly the same person. I've seen no evidence of any other catering directorships in his name.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are 4.7 billion people living on Earth.

> Only 5 or 6 people have expressed any concern

> About this place closing.

>

> Foxy


What happened


There were 7 Billion yesterday


Was it Trump

Hmmmm....

Foxy. A couple of days ago you hauled someone up for casually mentioning '7 curry houses' on Lordship Lane, where you pointed out it was 5 - a discrepancy of 2. Yes two. One, two - two !

NOW you casually disregard 2 BILLION of the population with a stroke of the keyboard ?!

Your error was AT LEAST a billion times as bad, by magnitude. That's a propa error.

This simply can't go on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't be just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...