Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beej Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sods law, after all the talk of the place this

> week I was planning to finally give it a try on

> Tuesday and again tonight, cest a vie.... good job

> I can never get enough of that weirdly trippy

> drippy hypnotic oil lamp thing in East Dulwich

> Tandoori.


That trippy drippy hypnotic oil lamp thing in Dulwich Tandoori Has been there for 20 years+ ??


It broke down but was repaired s couple of years back.


DulwichFox

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was told by another restaurant that they owned 3

> others and they all closed on the same day.

> Bob S


Draw your own conclusions. I've been told that this was a police raid, not an immigration raid. But of course Foxy & Louisa are quite correct that we should await any criminal charges before drawing any conclusions. And further comment on here could potentially be defamatory (apart from the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both ongoing and enjoyable). Enough said.

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


(apart from

> the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both

> ongoing and enjoyable).



It isn't ongoing.


I just wanted an answer, and I got it, so as far as I'm concerned that is the end of it.


I just don't understand why it wasn't forthcoming earlier, as it seemed a quite straightforward explanation.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> derwentgrove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> (apart from

> > the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both

> > ongoing and enjoyable).

>

>

> It isn't ongoing.

>

> I just wanted an answer, and I got it, so as far

> as I'm concerned that is the end of it.

>

> I just don't understand why it wasn't forthcoming

> earlier, as it seemed a quite straightforward

> explanation.


Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you should know that by now ;-)


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you should

> know that by now ;-)

>



Well I am straightforward, so I presume you are speaking for yourself?


ETA: And perhaps for Dulwich Fox if you are implying that his explanation wasn't in fact all that it seemed?


Oh well, I always was very gullible :(

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you

> should

> > know that by now ;-)

> >

>

>

> Well I am straightforward, so I presume you are

> speaking for yourself?



I am very straightforward too. It's often my downfall. You know as well as I do, Foxy sometimes goes off on a tangent, innocently and never offensively, and yet you goad him for answers when it isn't necessarily needed. That's my conclusion, but anyway let's drop it now.


Louisa.

ozzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A guy from there told me they were re-opening on

> march 16th selling indian food .


Thank god; we've needed a decent Indian on LL for ages. All we need now is a pizza place, cheese shop and some banners on lampposts and we're set.

> Ianr yes I was told the same.


Bob, I was quoting you and simply asking: which of A or B?


Anyway, for anyone inclined to fact-check the rumour of simultaneous closures ... The sole director/owner of Xoco Ltd of 44LL, incorporated March 2016, has the same name and birth month as the person who took over Chutney Jane Ltd of London SE, another restaurant business, in September 2015. So possibly the same person. I've seen no evidence of any other catering directorships in his name.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are 4.7 billion people living on Earth.

> Only 5 or 6 people have expressed any concern

> About this place closing.

>

> Foxy


What happened


There were 7 Billion yesterday


Was it Trump

Hmmmm....

Foxy. A couple of days ago you hauled someone up for casually mentioning '7 curry houses' on Lordship Lane, where you pointed out it was 5 - a discrepancy of 2. Yes two. One, two - two !

NOW you casually disregard 2 BILLION of the population with a stroke of the keyboard ?!

Your error was AT LEAST a billion times as bad, by magnitude. That's a propa error.

This simply can't go on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...