Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Declan - It depends at what levels you play, for how long and wether you want to play seriously. If you want to progress then only Pokerstars and Full Tilt have the liquidity to get cash games or Tourneys all the time at higher stakes. If you want to keep it small stakes then any well known site ie Ladbrokes, Party, William hill, Betfair etc PKR is good for a different feel and look but serious online players almost all play Pokerstars and Full Tilt. Get rakeback too

I find most poker sites difficult to make any profit on and know a lot of live players who would agree. I do pretty well at live poker.....up and down online.


Last horrible beat.....having my Aover5s flopped full house beat by an Aover7s on the river. Pot ?72.

DJ on youe internet point. I agree, satndard is now really pretty good a few years back was terrible with the boom and before the US rule changes. But plenty of games and I like mixed games and especially Omaha/HiLo, which most home games won't feature. I also like action and play about 4 tables at a time. i find live games sooo slow.
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

danmaitland Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree re online poker -0 very difficult for

> decent players to get ahead - as the software

> seems slanted to action and to the guy with trhe

> worst hand


i am not sure that i get this - are you saying that 'the software' doesn't deliver cards in a truly random way?


i know (and know of) a good number of very decent players who do consistently well, so i am surprised to hear some of these gripes

Ah Dan, the poker conspiracy theorist :P


I think it's pretty unlikely that the poker sites are rigged, especially the big ones, for several reasons. The data for millions and millions of hands is out there and available, I'm sure if there was a non random bias someone would have some decent evidence for it by now. All the big sites all have auditors for their random number generators, so it would have to be quite some conspiracy. Besides, they hardly need to. They are making a mint on the rakes from the huge numbers of people who are playing, getting busted for rigging the hands would lose them most of their custom, surely not worth it?


But I think the perception that this is happening is quite interesting. I suspect that it's a result of our human inability to really understand probability and statistics, confirmation bias etc etc (there are probably a ton of juicy cognitive biases that apply to online poker, check the terrifying list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases). Found a nice article here that explores some of the conspiracy theories in more detail http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/conspiracy.html.


That said, if anyone does have solid evidence for rigged sites I'd love to hear it. Though I wouldn't love to think I've been being conned by Party Poker all this time.

This....


is the place to read about online poker being rigged


...of course it's not. Most of the pro-online players have 10000s of hand histories so can do proper statistical testing...they know it's not (see the link), RGN's are audited, sites like Laddies show the number of times AA has been dealt since they startred ( a billion hands or whatever) and it's within a several fractional decimals point of where it should be by stats.


Finally, I've worked for two...and would I lie to you :))

online poker is hard to beat nowadys becuase


1) The standard of play is much, much, much better than during the boom a few years back and certainly better than live play. It's mainly TAG play rather than people not raising pre-flop and calling bets with crap.

2) so your edge is reduced significantly, even if your good

3) the Rake get's you


Most 'pro' players online are breakeven or just up but make their money largely through the loyalty schemes or rakeback...if you haven't got rakeback or aren't putting in the grind to get decent loyalt points it's tough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...