Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Declan - It depends at what levels you play, for how long and wether you want to play seriously. If you want to progress then only Pokerstars and Full Tilt have the liquidity to get cash games or Tourneys all the time at higher stakes. If you want to keep it small stakes then any well known site ie Ladbrokes, Party, William hill, Betfair etc PKR is good for a different feel and look but serious online players almost all play Pokerstars and Full Tilt. Get rakeback too

I find most poker sites difficult to make any profit on and know a lot of live players who would agree. I do pretty well at live poker.....up and down online.


Last horrible beat.....having my Aover5s flopped full house beat by an Aover7s on the river. Pot ?72.

DJ on youe internet point. I agree, satndard is now really pretty good a few years back was terrible with the boom and before the US rule changes. But plenty of games and I like mixed games and especially Omaha/HiLo, which most home games won't feature. I also like action and play about 4 tables at a time. i find live games sooo slow.
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

danmaitland Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree re online poker -0 very difficult for

> decent players to get ahead - as the software

> seems slanted to action and to the guy with trhe

> worst hand


i am not sure that i get this - are you saying that 'the software' doesn't deliver cards in a truly random way?


i know (and know of) a good number of very decent players who do consistently well, so i am surprised to hear some of these gripes

Ah Dan, the poker conspiracy theorist :P


I think it's pretty unlikely that the poker sites are rigged, especially the big ones, for several reasons. The data for millions and millions of hands is out there and available, I'm sure if there was a non random bias someone would have some decent evidence for it by now. All the big sites all have auditors for their random number generators, so it would have to be quite some conspiracy. Besides, they hardly need to. They are making a mint on the rakes from the huge numbers of people who are playing, getting busted for rigging the hands would lose them most of their custom, surely not worth it?


But I think the perception that this is happening is quite interesting. I suspect that it's a result of our human inability to really understand probability and statistics, confirmation bias etc etc (there are probably a ton of juicy cognitive biases that apply to online poker, check the terrifying list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases). Found a nice article here that explores some of the conspiracy theories in more detail http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/conspiracy.html.


That said, if anyone does have solid evidence for rigged sites I'd love to hear it. Though I wouldn't love to think I've been being conned by Party Poker all this time.

This....


is the place to read about online poker being rigged


...of course it's not. Most of the pro-online players have 10000s of hand histories so can do proper statistical testing...they know it's not (see the link), RGN's are audited, sites like Laddies show the number of times AA has been dealt since they startred ( a billion hands or whatever) and it's within a several fractional decimals point of where it should be by stats.


Finally, I've worked for two...and would I lie to you :))

online poker is hard to beat nowadys becuase


1) The standard of play is much, much, much better than during the boom a few years back and certainly better than live play. It's mainly TAG play rather than people not raising pre-flop and calling bets with crap.

2) so your edge is reduced significantly, even if your good

3) the Rake get's you


Most 'pro' players online are breakeven or just up but make their money largely through the loyalty schemes or rakeback...if you haven't got rakeback or aren't putting in the grind to get decent loyalt points it's tough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We have lots of shoes and need a nice way of organising them! 
    • Invitation to Expectant Parents: Infant Observation Are you due to give birth this September or October? Would you be interested in taking part in an Infant Observation with an NHS honorary psychotherapist?  I am an honorary psychotherapist working with adults in the NHS (Adult Complex Needs, Tavistock Clinic). I need to conduct an Infant Observation as part of my NHS training in psychodynamic psychotherapy. By taking part, you can contribute to mental health services and our understanding of human development from birth. Infant Observation is an established part of psychoanalytic training. It allows for the in-depth study of the early life and development of babies in relation to their caregiver(s) in their home environment. I am looking for expectant parent(s) who would be interested in taking part with their infant from about 6 weeks after birth, ideally beginning Oct/Nov 2025. The observation would take place for one hour each week during term time at the infant's home at the same time each week, to be agreed between myself and the caregiver(s), for the duration of 3 academic terms (roughly 9 months to 1 year). My role would be to non-intrusively observe and reflect on the infant's development and communications. The work is a requirement of my training at the Tavistock and would be supervised by a Tavistock clinician. Parents and caregivers can gain support and insight from taking part at this important and unique time in your baby's development. I work with adults in an Adult Complex Needs unit in the NHS, and at Tavistock Relationships. I have worked in a psychotherapy community for survivors of human rights violations where I helped establish a mother and baby group for refugee and asylum seeking mothers. I have a Phd in Literature & I am a contributor to the London Review of Books. I am working on my first book, a history of childhood. I am coming towards the end of my psychotherapy training having already gained a postgraduate diploma in Psychotherapy from the Tavistock NHS Clinic and University of Essex. If you would be interested in taking part with your infant, please respond to this post. With thanks, Mary Hannity
    • Like most of us, I'm guessing they didn't look into thoroughly
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...