Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DJKQ and others interested


This is a thread from 2+2 about 20 year old who went to Vegas and started posting about his poker and other stories - the bloke is a fantastic writer and very good and improving poker player whose gone from $1/$2 games to playing with well known pros in about 2 years..... it's really good on learning about advanced live poker skills too, although you have to know the basics and language


....a poker story from 2+2 - really good read and well written

  • 7 months later...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a prior engagement otherwise I'd be v upset

> about not being invited MrB. ;-)



Mick, can I remind you that "if you don't know who the sucker is at the poker table after 20 minutes, it's you" :))

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what version/rules did you play and what were

> the limits?



Not sure but apparently Quids went all-in with Mr Bones the Butcher but as Mr Ben can be any character it was a split pot.

  • 3 weeks later...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what version/rules did you play and what were

> the limits?



We played No Limit HE


we had a ?10(or?5?) Turbo Tournament winner takes all for the firs hour or so. Then the 'Main Event' was a ?30 buy in with Rebuys for the first hour (some of us didn't need it others needed a couple *cough MR Ben) and a ?20 add on available after an hour that everyone took. Having a pro-dealer just keeps the pace going nicely no way could we have done that self-dealing etc.

  • 7 months later...
Final table of the WSOP main event (effectively the world championship) is down to final 3 from original 6500, a mate of mine who I play a cash game with in Ireland and is a pro,has 10% of Jake? Who is one of the three- that's a minimum of ?200k for my mate right there. He's flown out to Vegas rail him!
  • 4 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...