Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst noting some old timers want to hark back to the days of hard boiled eggs on the bar, please can the esteemed members of the forum rank their pub Co brands by quality of food offering? 1=best etc


Contenders:


M&B (eg Plough,Dog)

Youngs (yacht club, the kids club on the hill)

Fullers (Half Moon)

Greene King (Bishop,The Actress, Rye etc)

Antic (EDT)

Laines (eg Great exhibition)


Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/147274-local-pub-co-food-rankings/
Share on other sites

I'd pretty much have the same order as DTR. M&B is just plain awful, which is another reason why when the newly refurbished C&G re-opens the food offerings will be crap compared to the Half Moon who have a proper and well renowned chef on site. Another own goal for Dulwich Estates.
Agree with Jeremy about Antic. They are clever about their food offering. The EDT is regular good standard but not great modern pub fare, given the huge range of other eating options on LL. The Catford Constitutional Club by contrast, is genuinely very good indeed ? in an area that's a bit of an eating-out desert.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd pretty much have the same order as DTR. M&B is

> just plain awful, which is another reason why when

> the newly refurbished C&G re-opens the food

> offerings will be crap compared to the Half Moon

> who have a proper and well renowned chef on site.

> Another own goal for Dulwich Estates.


Unless it's how they plan it :)

DovertheRoad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok...here's mine

>

> 1. Laines

> 2. Fullers

> 3. Greene King

> 4. Antic

> 5. Youngs

> 6. M&B's reheated slop


Broadly agree although I haven't eaten in a Fuller's bar for some years now. Surprising that Greene King - whose ales a pretty mediocre - manage passable food.


M&B is depressing and very expensive for what it is, especially if it's not on expenses. But a lot of people seem to like their food...

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who owns the Watson Telegraph? Anyway, they do

> good roasts.



I agree with this. WGT have great food and one of the best craft beer /ale selections in the area. Also a no screens policy so no sport shown which is often welcome.

I rarely eat in pubs - I don't really know why tbh, although if I'm out for beers ill tend to eat before i go out


I'm assuming you are not including the Lordship Frnaklins and Palmerston where I think people consider to be restaurants


I think my choices are pubs for drinking and the above three if going out principally for food.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pubs are for boozing not eating. However, like

> Brexit, it's too late to stop it. If you

> light-weights must have food then bring back

> scampi-in-the-basket and the cockle man turning up

> at last orders.



I swear this guy is Louisa's husband.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pubs are for boozing not eating. However, like

> > Brexit, it's too late to stop it. If you

> > light-weights must have food then bring back

> > scampi-in-the-basket and the cockle man turning

> up

> > at last orders.

>

>

> I swear this guy is Louisa's husband.


I wish ...

To be fair to Keano, I am kind of with him.


It's not that I don't want to see food in pubs, I just wish it wasn't in pretty much EVERY pub.


I realise that the pubs (especially in London) basically need to sell food to survive, and that the sort of place I long for is history. But that doesn't mean I can't long for it.


Think I said to someone the other day, what I long for is a really nice "old man's pub", just with good beer and less miserable old men.


I need to move back to Liverpool, they still seem to exist there.


Anyway, as you were.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...