Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I quote directly from the letter sent to me from the CEO's office. It may refer to on-site secure parking (in mitigation) which I would not know about


The main driving reason to relocate is size. East Dulwich Delivery Office does not have enough capacity for the increase in parcels and doesn?t have sufficient parking for our vehicles. Peckham Delivery Office has the capacity to alleviate all these issues.

I thought the parking mentioned at the meeting was referring to the staff's own cars (they can drive to work and park in Sylvester Road, but won't be able to in Peckham).


I don't recall that there was any mention at all of lack of parking for Royal Mail vehicles.

  • 4 weeks later...

Royal Mail's annual profits have jumped 25% thanks to better-than-expected growth in its parcel delivery business.

Parcel deliveries rose 3% thanks to shoppers' insatiable appetite for online shopping, although the number of letters posted fell by 6%.


Royal Mail put the rise in parcels down to upgraded computer systems, which allow the packages to be sorted faster.

Pre-tax profits rose to ?335m in the year to 26 March from ?267m, while revenues grew 1% to ?9.8bn.


Article here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39959159


DulwichFox

Penguin68 wrote above:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have also received a reply from the CEO's office

.....

> It was perhaps an irony that one of the reasons given for

> the need to move from Silvester was parking problems -


Over the last few Sundays there have been 6-8 RM vans comfortably parked at the back of the delivery office in Pellatt Road, with on one occasion one in Crystal Palace Road.

There is a protest against this closure TOMORROW in Sylvester Road, but for some reason my post about it has been moved to the "What's On" section.


Anyway, more information here:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?6,1824930


It's at 1.30pm and Helen Hayes will be there.

I had some standard responses to the email and follow up email I sent to the post office, really disappointing. Initially failed to answer my questions directly and then said at a cost I could have parcels dropped off at other post offices locally (if those post offices were partaking).

Consultation based on my experience means decisions have been made and I think their approach is distasteful to their customers. Their initial email drew out how they would look after their employees, which I found rather silly to draw out given they are required by law to do xyz, so no, they are just doing what they need to, rather than benefit employees - and have no regard to the community.

  • 1 month later...
Staff were informed today that the consultation has now closed and Royal Mail have decided to close the office and move to Peckham. It will take some months because work will need to be done on the building, duties will need to be reorganised and extra vans purchased to replace the trolleys. Very disappointing for both staff and customers.

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How frustrating.... I don't think Royal Mail was

> ever going to listen to locals or their posties.

> They'll be doing a lot of redeliveries!


Indeed. Hit them and their shareholders in the wallet. If the package isn't urgent, get them to redeliver for free:

http://www.royalmail.com/personal/receiving-mail/redelivery

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, Pugwash. That's really useful information. Do you know who was responsible for the locks and keys, or which council department? Could you PM me if you don't want to put someone's personal details on here?  It may save me having to speak to Monica. Thanks.
    • Does anybody know why? Trees aren't cut down for no reason. There must have been something wrong with it (I hope that was the reason). A child was recently killed and another one injured when a tree fell in a park (not in this area). It isn't always obvious from the outside when a tree is diseased or whatever, and I imagine the council would give safety considerations priority when deciding what to do, if there was any doubt at all.
    • It looks like they have cut it down completely now 😭
    • Different people will be  involved within Thames Water. The people dealing with the leaks aren't the people encouraging less water usage. How many people have reported the Barry Road leak? By what channels? What response have they had? When we had a leak in our road which meant we had no water, several people reported it, there was good communication with TW, they explained why they couldn't come out immediately (other urgent jobs elsewhere in the area) , kept  in touch with us and fixed the leak within a reasonable timescale (hours). Someone from TW also contacted me later to make sure my water was back. But does Thames Water know about it? They aren't psychic (I presume). If nobody reports it, I also presume they won't even know the leaks are  there, unless they have some kind of central monitoring system which tells them when there are leaks in the system. To make it clear, I am not defending Thames Water as a company, which I think should never have been privatised.  But there are some things they can't be blamed for (old and disintegrating water pipe system in London) and some they can (possibly, lack of sufficient staff to deal with leaks, maybe due to trying to save money to give their shareholders more. But this is just surmise on my part - I know nothing about Thames Water).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...