Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting piece on radio quattro just now about emoticons.

It is 25 years ago today that the original emoticon was formulated, by a chap in a university somewhere in the states. He developed it for use on the university intranet notice board, where people had discussions that got quite heated and people took things the wrong way etc, (obvious parallels).

Then a chap from (I think) the Gaurdian came on to say how much he didn't like them as the written word had been doing fine and if you can't get the jist of your writings across then you are not writing well enough etc etc.



I don't use them myself but am fairly ambivalent about their usage. However I am not keen on the usage of them to 'make light' of an offensive comment.


Any one care to discuss or will this slip off the bottom of the page in a flash.(?)

>:D

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/
Share on other sites

the written word isn't something everyone is good at and I think people have cottoned on that a "dry" email or post can come across a bit stridently so emoticons can help them


Of course that means people who are offensive try an abuse that but we can tell the difference I think


I use them, but try not to - far better to choose words carefully

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40179
Share on other sites

I find them extremely useful - and on a board like this when they are rendered graphically :) so they are likely to be understood.


But the problem in email is I don't always know if they will be understood by the reader. So I would tend to use "!" or similar.


The written word may have got by without it, but that is carefully crafted and considered- not a quickly dashed off email.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40191
Share on other sites

Exactly right Andrew, emails and texts have made us all in a rush to say what we want to say, and emoticons make it easier to get your meaning across. It's just snobbery to suggest that someone who choses to use one is not able to express themselves through words.


I think they're fun particularly :-S , :)-D and >:D<


I got burnt once when I sent a "dry" email to a good female friend of mine who had just postponed a lunch date. I said something like "you could break a mans heart letting him down like that" and I could hear myself saying it in the way it was meant.


I later got a very long email from my friend "letting me down gently"... All rather embarrasing, and I have since been a big believer in ";-)"


I'm still good friends with said lady by the way, and we've since laughed about it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40193
Share on other sites

there you see, if I had got an email like that from a good, male friend I'm fairly sure I would not have taken it to mean that the friend was harbouring a deep, unrequited love for me without an emoticon to tell me that it was a joke.


I was going to put in my original post that this was not meant to be a one upmanship type of discussion 'oh people who use them are inferior to those who don't etc etc' so it wouldn't boil down to s snob, class war discussion.


happy 20th birthday the emoticon!


here's the Guardian article

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40198
Share on other sites

Emoticons. I despair.

I'm aware that 90% of the people love sprinkling them liberally around their postings, so I'll try not to go-off on one. But really. Come on. They're for dummies;-). They're no better than idiotic abbreviated text messages or putting a hundred exclamation marks after every sentence!!!!!!!


I know most people here use them lazily (and more often than not just because everybody else does) - so naturally you're all forgiven. But they're still for dummies.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40312
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They're no better than idiotic abbreviated text messages or putting a hundred

> exclamation marks after every sentence!!!!!!!


I can be rather guilty of the exclamation mark thing.


However, they are not as annoying as text language "alrt m8, c u in pb l8r" What? I never use text speak, because I find it hard enough to read, and by the time I've worked out what I want to write, I may as well just write the word.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40346
Share on other sites

I'd always thought they were on a par with dotting your i with a luv heart, and frankly despised them. I have come to see the error of my ways (particularly in light of Keef's friend's misunderstanding - lummy!!!)


but I still can't quite bring myself to go on a date with a man who uses them - am I missing out?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40389
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...