Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting piece on radio quattro just now about emoticons.

It is 25 years ago today that the original emoticon was formulated, by a chap in a university somewhere in the states. He developed it for use on the university intranet notice board, where people had discussions that got quite heated and people took things the wrong way etc, (obvious parallels).

Then a chap from (I think) the Gaurdian came on to say how much he didn't like them as the written word had been doing fine and if you can't get the jist of your writings across then you are not writing well enough etc etc.



I don't use them myself but am fairly ambivalent about their usage. However I am not keen on the usage of them to 'make light' of an offensive comment.


Any one care to discuss or will this slip off the bottom of the page in a flash.(?)

>:D

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/
Share on other sites

the written word isn't something everyone is good at and I think people have cottoned on that a "dry" email or post can come across a bit stridently so emoticons can help them


Of course that means people who are offensive try an abuse that but we can tell the difference I think


I use them, but try not to - far better to choose words carefully

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40179
Share on other sites

I find them extremely useful - and on a board like this when they are rendered graphically :) so they are likely to be understood.


But the problem in email is I don't always know if they will be understood by the reader. So I would tend to use "!" or similar.


The written word may have got by without it, but that is carefully crafted and considered- not a quickly dashed off email.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40191
Share on other sites

Exactly right Andrew, emails and texts have made us all in a rush to say what we want to say, and emoticons make it easier to get your meaning across. It's just snobbery to suggest that someone who choses to use one is not able to express themselves through words.


I think they're fun particularly :-S , :)-D and >:D<


I got burnt once when I sent a "dry" email to a good female friend of mine who had just postponed a lunch date. I said something like "you could break a mans heart letting him down like that" and I could hear myself saying it in the way it was meant.


I later got a very long email from my friend "letting me down gently"... All rather embarrasing, and I have since been a big believer in ";-)"


I'm still good friends with said lady by the way, and we've since laughed about it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40193
Share on other sites

there you see, if I had got an email like that from a good, male friend I'm fairly sure I would not have taken it to mean that the friend was harbouring a deep, unrequited love for me without an emoticon to tell me that it was a joke.


I was going to put in my original post that this was not meant to be a one upmanship type of discussion 'oh people who use them are inferior to those who don't etc etc' so it wouldn't boil down to s snob, class war discussion.


happy 20th birthday the emoticon!


here's the Guardian article

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40198
Share on other sites

Emoticons. I despair.

I'm aware that 90% of the people love sprinkling them liberally around their postings, so I'll try not to go-off on one. But really. Come on. They're for dummies;-). They're no better than idiotic abbreviated text messages or putting a hundred exclamation marks after every sentence!!!!!!!


I know most people here use them lazily (and more often than not just because everybody else does) - so naturally you're all forgiven. But they're still for dummies.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40312
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They're no better than idiotic abbreviated text messages or putting a hundred

> exclamation marks after every sentence!!!!!!!


I can be rather guilty of the exclamation mark thing.


However, they are not as annoying as text language "alrt m8, c u in pb l8r" What? I never use text speak, because I find it hard enough to read, and by the time I've worked out what I want to write, I may as well just write the word.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40346
Share on other sites

I'd always thought they were on a par with dotting your i with a luv heart, and frankly despised them. I have come to see the error of my ways (particularly in light of Keef's friend's misunderstanding - lummy!!!)


but I still can't quite bring myself to go on a date with a man who uses them - am I missing out?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1476-emoticons/#findComment-40389
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...