Jump to content

Recommended Posts

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode in,

> unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters, and

> came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> his stuff.


How many people are permitted to accompany a recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

Milan05 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> womanofdulwich Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode

> in,

> > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> and

> > came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> > his stuff.

>

> How many people are permitted to accompany a

> recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?


Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.


"We invite as many Award recipients as possible to attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As space in the State Apartments is limited you are only able to bring one personal guest, who must be over the age of 16."


http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitation

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Borky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think I will depart now.

> >

> > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> responses

> > are these days.

>

> "These days"? You've only been on here since last September!



Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...

Thanks John.



ohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Milan05 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----Thanks John.

> > > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he

> strode

> > in,

> > > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> > and

> > > came to talk to guests. He was impressive.

> Knew

> > > his stuff.

> >

> > How many people are permitted to accompany a

> > recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

>

> Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.

>

> "We invite as many Award recipients as possible to

> attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As

> space in the State Apartments is limited you are

> only able to bring one personal guest, who must be

> over the age of 16."

>

> http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitat

> ion

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


And one that rhymes with the current name, I'd guess.

I rather like his sense of humour and that he uses it to deal with what must be pretty tedious activities (not Sn, sorry, Borky: Prince Philip). He's spent his whole life getting on with what has to be done, apparently not worrying too much how sections of the media may spin it, and accepting the limitations his role has imposed on him, such as not being able to give his own children his surname, his family's exile from Greece and his mother's mental illness.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yes. Reminds me of a former poster, with a username that sounded very similar to this one. Although this latest one is more like a crude parody of the original.

I was lucky enough to attend Buckingham Palace presentation last may, and it was only one guest on the invitation. However, and I'm not sure if this was because it was the Diamond jubilee year, my husband was also allowed to attend, as he signed up to complete a Diamond Challenge.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yeahhhhh, borky's back!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...