Jump to content

Recommended Posts

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode in,

> unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters, and

> came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> his stuff.


How many people are permitted to accompany a recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

Milan05 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> womanofdulwich Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode

> in,

> > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> and

> > came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> > his stuff.

>

> How many people are permitted to accompany a

> recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?


Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.


"We invite as many Award recipients as possible to attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As space in the State Apartments is limited you are only able to bring one personal guest, who must be over the age of 16."


http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitation

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Borky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think I will depart now.

> >

> > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> responses

> > are these days.

>

> "These days"? You've only been on here since last September!



Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...

Thanks John.



ohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Milan05 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----Thanks John.

> > > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he

> strode

> > in,

> > > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> > and

> > > came to talk to guests. He was impressive.

> Knew

> > > his stuff.

> >

> > How many people are permitted to accompany a

> > recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

>

> Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.

>

> "We invite as many Award recipients as possible to

> attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As

> space in the State Apartments is limited you are

> only able to bring one personal guest, who must be

> over the age of 16."

>

> http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitat

> ion

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


And one that rhymes with the current name, I'd guess.

I rather like his sense of humour and that he uses it to deal with what must be pretty tedious activities (not Sn, sorry, Borky: Prince Philip). He's spent his whole life getting on with what has to be done, apparently not worrying too much how sections of the media may spin it, and accepting the limitations his role has imposed on him, such as not being able to give his own children his surname, his family's exile from Greece and his mother's mental illness.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yes. Reminds me of a former poster, with a username that sounded very similar to this one. Although this latest one is more like a crude parody of the original.

I was lucky enough to attend Buckingham Palace presentation last may, and it was only one guest on the invitation. However, and I'm not sure if this was because it was the Diamond jubilee year, my husband was also allowed to attend, as he signed up to complete a Diamond Challenge.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yeahhhhh, borky's back!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...