Jump to content

Recommended Posts

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode in,

> unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters, and

> came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> his stuff.


How many people are permitted to accompany a recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

Milan05 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> womanofdulwich Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he strode

> in,

> > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> and

> > came to talk to guests. He was impressive. Knew

> > his stuff.

>

> How many people are permitted to accompany a

> recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?


Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.


"We invite as many Award recipients as possible to attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As space in the State Apartments is limited you are only able to bring one personal guest, who must be over the age of 16."


http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitation

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Borky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think I will depart now.

> >

> > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> responses

> > are these days.

>

> "These days"? You've only been on here since last September!



Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...

Thanks John.



ohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Milan05 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----Thanks John.

> > > Saw him last year at a DOE ceremony, he

> strode

> > in,

> > > unaided, chatted with our sons and daughters,

> > and

> > > came to talk to guests. He was impressive.

> Knew

> > > his stuff.

> >

> > How many people are permitted to accompany a

> > recipient of a Gold DoE at Buck House?

>

> Only one it seems - to St James's anyway.

>

> "We invite as many Award recipients as possible to

> attend a presentation at St James?s Palace. As

> space in the State Apartments is limited you are

> only able to bring one personal guest, who must be

> over the age of 16."

>

> http://www.dofe.info/go/londongapinfo/#Pre_invitat

> ion

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


And one that rhymes with the current name, I'd guess.

I rather like his sense of humour and that he uses it to deal with what must be pretty tedious activities (not Sn, sorry, Borky: Prince Philip). He's spent his whole life getting on with what has to be done, apparently not worrying too much how sections of the media may spin it, and accepting the limitations his role has imposed on him, such as not being able to give his own children his surname, his family's exile from Greece and his mother's mental illness.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yes. Reminds me of a former poster, with a username that sounded very similar to this one. Although this latest one is more like a crude parody of the original.

I was lucky enough to attend Buckingham Palace presentation last may, and it was only one guest on the invitation. However, and I'm not sure if this was because it was the Diamond jubilee year, my husband was also allowed to attend, as he signed up to complete a Diamond Challenge.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Borky Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think I will depart now.

> > >

> > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the

> > responses

> > > are these days.

> >

> > "These days"? You've only been on here since

> last September!

>

>

> Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate...


Yeahhhhh, borky's back!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
    • Angela Rayner had this country at her feet but as soon as I saw that photo of her lounging about in the kayak off her new seaside home, vaping and drinking! 
    • This is horrible to hear about. We used to get daily Police patrols on foot & even regular patrols on horseback in the area. I know our local station had some bad eggs, but the officers I came across in the area back then were all a fantastic bunch. Sadly nowadays the Met's presence is non-existent, bar the weekly walk from the SNT. I hope something gets done, arrests made and the victim some genuine support and counselling.   
    • Two wrongs don't make a right. Labour ran on a manifesto of "we aren't like them" and "we are different" and"you can trust us/we will restore faith in politics". They are doing nothing to convince anyone that any of those promises are being met - they are letting everyone down. u-turning on everything and are fast-tracking the doomsday scenario of a Reform government. Even the runway on the "it's all the Tories fault" is running out. I dislike politicians because they cannot be trusted and Rayner just highlighted that with ribbons on. She should have been so careful after the focus on the electoral roll issues she had with the house in Ashton-under-Lyne and then under a year later this comes up. Clearly the advice she took included a recommendation to take proper advice that she failed to do - that's just daft and the most galling thing is that she didn't just resign when this came up - she tried to spin out of it but must have known she was toast. Trust is fast being eroded. I desperately want Labour and Starmer to fix this because the alternative it too scary to think about but the way things are going they are fast-tracking Farage into No.10. Labour are letting us all down.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...