Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Exactly Keef - although to be fair the latest versions I played last week show just enough progress (mostly around 360 degree movement instead of normal 8 direction pad - but anyway)


I never trust them either - if I play against the computer and leave my pad untouched, the opposition should just walk the ball into the net - but no, they all act like 11 Franny Jeffers and kick the ball every which way for 10 minutes

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I got bored of FIFA games, because basically you

> pay for the same game year in year out, with just

> a few minimal improvements IMO.


Isn?t that the ultimate in realism though? It?s exactly like the premiership.

As a little stocking filler you could give yourself this tower defence game.

It's very well balanced, good looking and rather addictive. Not bad for about 7 quid.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/defensegridtheawakening

  • 4 weeks later...

Borderlands - just brilliant.


The bastard son of Left for Dead, Fallout 3, Doom, Serious Sam and Diablo - oh and some Phantasy Star Online too - it's a loot-whoring game extraodinaire, with a beautiful graphic style. The critics and the public seem to have split on this one but Lady Mac hasn't seen me this addicted to a single game in a long time

Or do I just wair for Diablo II?


I'm currently ploughing into Forza Motorsport 3. Yes it's basically a very pretty FM2, with better physics and leaderboards but all the little touches like dirty laps, quick upgrades are well thought out, plus it's te nly game where the in car view is actually the best one as opposed to an unplayable but pretty distraction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This presumably hasn't been done by vandals. It's hardly a Sycamore Gap situation. So if it's been done by professionals, unless it was a mistake (unlikely) there must have been a good reason, as it would have cost money. It would perhaps have been a good idea to put a notice on the tree explaining why such drastic work was done, but usually (I think) it would be either because of disease (often not noticeable on the surface) or that the roots or branches  were endangering nearby structures. As already said, nobody on here is likely to know. The tree department in Southwark Council are helpful in my (admittedly limited) experience. Please post on here when you have found out, as I agree what's left of the tree looks pretty odd. Depending on why the work was done, possibly they intend to remove the rest as well?
    • I have a very stupid question. I want to get a SIM card to put in an old mobile as a back up,  in case despite my best efforts my mobile gets stolen and I have no way of contacting anybody quickly, eg banks. Can I just buy any old cheap pay as you go  SIM card and put say ten pounds on it and it will then be fine for years (with the phone kept charged!) even if I don't use it, or do I have to use the phone  every so often to keep the SIM card valid?
    • I hate to see trees cut down to such an unfinished state. Unless the tree is home to wildlife, an effort should be made to remove & replace. Otherwise, it's just so useless & unsightly.
    • Given the level of care in Dulwich Park, I would not expect this to be careless or unnecessary. It will grow back.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...