Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't speak for the reliability of it, but screenshots of the account are circulating on social media. Search "twitter suspended terrorist account Manchester".


The Express has also picked up the story...https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/808077/Manchester-terror-bombing-explosion-attack-Ariana-Grande-manchester-arena-ISIS-twitter/amp

Also making social media rounds:


22-05-13 lee rigby

22-03-16 Brussels attack

22-07-16 Munich attack

22-03-17 London attack

22-05-17 Manchester attack

22-07-17 ???

Can you see a pattern??



Are these ALL right? I spot checked a couple.

Weird. Make of it what you will.

There will always be utter bastards like this in the world, but we should remember that not one single terrorist organisation has ever succeeded in its stated aims through the use of violence and murder alone.


Israel is still there, Northern Ireland is still there, capitalism is still flourishing. America got past McVey. For decades people have thought that killing a few innocents would show how seriously they should be taken.


Ultimately, as long as all they do is kill and maim, we will continue to go on with out lives, never giving in to these people. Manchester joins the sad group of places scarred by savage hatred, but it will pick itself up and show the world what it - and the rest of us - think of those who believe this is a path to getting what they want.


And though it's a horrible way to look at it, it says volumes about how they've been curtailed that something like a pop concert is the only type of target they have any realistic chance of attacking.

Concerning social media, a friend of mine posted this elsewhere.


"I was watching as this happened last night and Twitter is becoming as much of a hinderance as a help in situations like these. People talk about fake news like it's dreamt up by media organisations - which it sometimes is - or kids in Macedonian caves, but it's plain as day that a large number of normal users derive some kind of egotistical satisfaction from playing journalist/detective and being first to the "story". The balloon theory came and went, mainly because a security guard at the venue told someone that is what it was. People are still telling parents there are 60 kids holed up in a Holiday Inn, they're not. There was a grid of missing people being shared, most of whom were never missing but their mates had posted their pic almost immediately. The Sun (obviously never a hotbed of accuracy) asked to use a picture purporting to be of dead bodies in the foyer and it wasn't even the same arena. All of which is incredibly shit if you're a parent looking on.


These reports led to inference and speculation on BBC and Sky, who were keen to keep up with the American networks that were ahead of the curve. The American networks were ahead in calling 1) a nail bomb 2) fatalities, because they don't care about due journalistic diligence and went with the if it quacks like duck approach. Anyone could quickly discern what had likely happened when pics of people in torn clothing and with shrapnel wounds started emerging, but there's a difference in confirming it. It's a dangerous precedent and could play into would-be attackers hands."

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> huh?! I suppose that's one thing to be focussing

> your anxiety on.


huh?! That perfectly reasonable set of observations about social media were probably not either tj's only focus or a source of anxiety. It can indeed be extraordinarily heartless and potentially dangerous to relay rumours, which in these cases alas always include false ones.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> robbin Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > huh?! I suppose that's one thing to be

> focussing

> > your anxiety on.

>

> huh?! That perfectly reasonable set of

> observations about social media were probably not

> either tj's only focus or a source of anxiety. It

> can indeed be extraordinarily heartless and

> potentially dangerous to relay rumours, which in

> these cases alas always include false ones.


Yes, thanks, that's basically it.

These are terrible events, and unspeakable for those involved. However, we should be grateful to the security services. This kind of attack is now very rare (far rarer than the IRA attacks when I was younger). We have not had anything like this since 2005. It has become hugely difficult for people to organise this sort of thing (even if this proves to be from a cell from which further atrocities follow).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can you see a pattern??

>

> Erm... no not really!


Erm thanks, Jeremy...though to clarify, it was not a question I myself was asking! It was a quote making social media rounds.


It was just somethig I found interesting/weird, i.e. that someone had found this pattern at all. As robbin notes, there are sadly many other bombings not included.


I could have looked at all these dates for years and never come up with this. People are strange.


Conspiracies abound, no doubt.

There's posts on YouTube (mainly by Americans) within a short no. of hours after the attack claiming the Manchester attack is a hoax - challenging the 'way' people were evacuating the arena (bystanders were just stood there watching, but the poster didn't realise he was showing a clip from Victoria station as people ran there to get trains - so of couse there would be bystanders who were regular customers waiting for their trains wondering what the sudden panicked influx of people wa all about).

There's always someone going to say what happened is not real.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There's always someone going to say what

> happened

> > is not real.

>

>

> A.K.A REALLY sad people with empty lives.


I suspect it's just a coping mechanism of sorts

A lot of it is just misguided tossers, the couple I saw relating to Manchester were prsented as fact with a "but I'll leave you to decide" finale.

Utter BS.

Even if they'd been correct, the 'facts' presented to back-up the assertion simply didn't support it !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...