Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


I'd like your opinions as I'm buying a tandem buggy to use when my second baby is born in 3 months' time (older child will be 17 months). After a little looking around I had decided on a Phil and Teds - but then I saw in a forgotten corner of John Lewis the Safety First Duodeal tandem. I had a demo and was impressed. No seats to clip/unclip, back seat reclines fully for newborn, both seats can recline even when both occupied, seats are one behind another rather than one underneath the other like the P&T's, it is the same length and slightly narrower than the P&T's (although feels a bit longer as it doesn't taper at the front as it is a 4-wheeler), it folds without having to remove any seats, and it is ONLY ?139 new including raincover, no extra bits to have to buy.


Basically what I'm wondering is, what is the catch? It seems to have better features than the P&T's but has anyone out there actually used it and put it to the test?


Opinions gratefully received,


Debs

It's not a big name, that is probably the only reason. The big name prams and buggys are quite simply overpriced for what they are, but they get away with it because people want "the best" for their babies, especially first ones, so they spend a fortune on prams, thinking they're the best, when actually you can get just as good a lot cheaper.
Make sure the wheels are either solid rubber, or pram tires or it's a sprung frame otherwise, if it has mclaren type wheels, you'll ruin your back pushing it around. The older & heavier child tends to sit at the front making the force needed to get up & down curbs & round corners - unless its got moveable wheels - much more than usual & so much more damaging. I speak from bitter experience :(
I think I know the one you mean, and I think it's cheaper than a P+T or equivalent because like Keef said, it's not a known brand name and it's no-frills, really. Also not as aesthetically pleasing, some might say. We looked at that one too and it didn't have the options we liked in the p+t- different seating options (can put carseat on the top for a newborn if you want to turn it into a travel system) and can't convert into a single buggy in due course.
Safety First Duodeal tandem looks very long to me and I guess will be awkward to take corners etc.We bought P&T for ours boys and I love it even that I have used it 3 times for both of them,baby no 2 is full time in sling,but I use it for my toddler.Is easy to push,fits easily on the bus...My neighbour had a very similar(maybe even these same) buggy and few days ago I saw her pushing brand new,shiny P&T.So I wouldn't risk buying SFD if I will have money for P&T.I know they are pricey but they are worth every penny and are made to last.

I think it really depends on what your priorities are - it looks like a basic old school tandem - fantastic price and will do the job. I would really check out the weight issue - put your toddler in the front seat and try lifting it as if up a kerb or step. And wheel it round John Lewis with toddler in it and make sure you can take the corners. The p&t are super expensive but the weight distribution is great and as someone else said the bonus is they work just as well as a single buggy.


I LOVE this forum on baby centre for double buggy questions.

I don't want to be alarmist, but two models of Phil and Ted's were recalled in Canada and the US yesterday due to finger amputation risk.


Anyway, I think it's based on a handful of cases and not an epidemic or anything but if I had one I'd want to at least know about it, so thought I'd pass the info along.


Don't imagine they are in any hurry to recall the bazillions sold in the UK.


Edited to add: I was going to add a link so googled it, and discovered they were also recalled in 2008. Maybe not the same model though and it is ONLY two models. Sorry the url is too long for me to add tonight...... too lazy :-$

I am going out on a limb here (excuse the related recall pun) and will inevitably be shot down by saying I absolutely LOATHED, LOATHED, LOATHED the P&T. I found it extremely heavy (forget trying to get it into a car), clumsy (felt like I was pushing a loaded wayward supermarket trolley around), the tyres a right pain (e.g. found the front one had a habit of coming off the wheel frame), the handle height awkward for a tall person, and the brake difficult to operate (unless you had the calf muscles of a weight lifter). Also took up acres of space in the house.


On the plus side, my husband did manage to slice off a finger wart when collapsing the darn thing down one day. Having tried every wart remover remedy under the sun, the P&T came up trumps.


There is definitely an opportunity for a designer to create an aesthetically pleasing double buggy that ticks the above boxes. Because IMO there's nothing yet out there.


As someone has mentioned above, definitely experiment with weight before you buy. I think, in time, you'll really value maneuverability and lightness over trend-following.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was woken around midnight the other night as a Lime man tried to untangle a heap of three bikes someone had piled on my driveway. They block the pavements and people knock them over in frustration. I wrote to Lime and told them that in future any bikes left near my property would be securely stored away for collection at a mutually convenient time for both parties. I confiscated one at the weekend but a man knocked on our door looking to rent it while I was at work and my son gave it to him! I told Lime it's not fair of them to push the problem on to the local collection depots, they create the problem by allowing users to dump the things wherever they like. If they were penalized for doing so that would put an end to it.
    • The SDCAS Crowdfund campaign is now live: Help Save Southwark Day Centre for Asylum Seekers! "I’m proud to be an advice volunteer at Southwark Day Centre for Asylum Seekers (SDCAS), a community that welcomes and supports refugees, migrants, and asylum seekers in Southwark. Right now, we’re facing the toughest moment in our nearly 30-year history. Unless we raise funds this September, we may not be able to keep offering the hot meals, English classes, advice, and safe community space that so many people rely on. That’s why I’m asking you to support our emergency Crowdfunder: 👉https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/save-sdcas  Even a small donation, or sharing this with your friends and family, will make a huge difference in helping us to reach our £70,000 goal and keep SDCAS open. This place means so much to me, and to everyone who walks through our doors 💛.Thank you for your support in spreading the word.  ... Be sure to tag us @SouthwarkAsylum on Facebook and @sdcascommunity on Instagram We really value your support, £70K is an ambitious goal but we know our dedicated supporters can get us over the line! Our sincere thanks in advance from all of us at SDCAS. Best wishes Judith Arkwright"  
    • The address is: Bradbury Oak House, 4 Underhill Road, SE22 0AH
    • "2.2.1 The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) has undertaken a comprehensive consultation process with its residents and stakeholders regarding the proposed development which aims to create 41 additional units and has been designed to address the growing demand for accessible and supportive accommodation for individuals with visual impairments. 2.2.2 The consultation process has been a key part of the planning phase, ensuring that the needs and preferences of current residents are taken into account. RNIB has held several meetings, workshops, and surveys to gather feedback on the design, facilities, and overall impact of the new development. Residents have been encouraged to share their views on various aspects, including accessibility features, communal spaces, and the integration of the new blocks with the existing infrastructure which has directly informed the proposals. 2.2.3 The Applicant also engaged with the local MP, Helen Hayes, and a couple of local councillors at the behest of RNIB tenants to provide new homes to promote independent living for its Blind and Partially Sighted residents"     Seems like a very sensible and necessary proposal to me.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...