Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In a past life I was called Henry Cotton and I have been told that I was instrumental in setting up the Aquarius Golf Club in Honor Oak, which is not a million miles from East Dulwich.


(I also won the Open a few times, but I'm usually too modest to mention that and I guess its not really East Dulwich relevant, wheras the Acquarius part is).


In comparison my current life has been disappointing and I can't wait to get started on a new one. I'm sure you feel the same about yours Betsy.

I love it. You all pile in taking the proverbial on this thread.....but with bending car keys, disappearing bikes, parallel universes and healing hands on the "Supernatural" thread it's all quiet.


Troops! Atten-shun! Get out and spread the sceptical message.

I haven't even read the other thread.


My main issue with "past lives", is that they always seem very grand and impressive. I think I'd be more inclined to believe it if someone said to me "you lived an unremarkable life, had 4 kids, and died of a heart attack at the age of 73".


But people wouldn't be so keen on paying to find that out.

Hi betsy. If you are posting a genuine message (whixh I hope you are), could you please give me the name of your therapist as i am interested in past life regression and hope this would help me sort out lots of stuff that i have going on at the moment.

Past Life Regression is only the first stage. After achieving one or more successful sessions, one can advance to the so-called Life Between Lives Regression to commune with the ?Blue Lights? and then on to Future Progression, which enables one to explore lives yet to be lived - apparently.


I've experienced all of the above, both as inductee and inducer - great fun if approached with an open mind. But not everyone can achieve the necessary state of deep reverie. It's nothing like hypnosis, by the way. During reverie, the subject is conscious and fully aware of everything going on throughout the session.


I've reached the stage where I can self-induce reverie and guide myself through regressions and progressions. I still don't believe in reincarnation, though.


I would advise anyone wishing to try this to exercise caution ? it can be quite addictive and most ?qualified? practitioners charge several hundred pounds per session - it can become a very expensive pass-time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...