Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In a past life I was called Henry Cotton and I have been told that I was instrumental in setting up the Aquarius Golf Club in Honor Oak, which is not a million miles from East Dulwich.


(I also won the Open a few times, but I'm usually too modest to mention that and I guess its not really East Dulwich relevant, wheras the Acquarius part is).


In comparison my current life has been disappointing and I can't wait to get started on a new one. I'm sure you feel the same about yours Betsy.

I love it. You all pile in taking the proverbial on this thread.....but with bending car keys, disappearing bikes, parallel universes and healing hands on the "Supernatural" thread it's all quiet.


Troops! Atten-shun! Get out and spread the sceptical message.

I haven't even read the other thread.


My main issue with "past lives", is that they always seem very grand and impressive. I think I'd be more inclined to believe it if someone said to me "you lived an unremarkable life, had 4 kids, and died of a heart attack at the age of 73".


But people wouldn't be so keen on paying to find that out.

Hi betsy. If you are posting a genuine message (whixh I hope you are), could you please give me the name of your therapist as i am interested in past life regression and hope this would help me sort out lots of stuff that i have going on at the moment.

Past Life Regression is only the first stage. After achieving one or more successful sessions, one can advance to the so-called Life Between Lives Regression to commune with the ?Blue Lights? and then on to Future Progression, which enables one to explore lives yet to be lived - apparently.


I've experienced all of the above, both as inductee and inducer - great fun if approached with an open mind. But not everyone can achieve the necessary state of deep reverie. It's nothing like hypnosis, by the way. During reverie, the subject is conscious and fully aware of everything going on throughout the session.


I've reached the stage where I can self-induce reverie and guide myself through regressions and progressions. I still don't believe in reincarnation, though.


I would advise anyone wishing to try this to exercise caution ? it can be quite addictive and most ?qualified? practitioners charge several hundred pounds per session - it can become a very expensive pass-time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...