How naff is it?

[????]

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your just as bad as the ranting 'Canary' lot

> quids. Just as hysterical. The Labour Party aren't

> Maoists any more than the Conservatives are

> Fascists. It's childish hyperbole and your guilty

> of it as much as those you're criticising.

Do you want clips of Abbot on Mao "On balance did more good than Harm"; McDonnell justifying the riots as an insurrection; Milne defending the USSR and fecking Stalin; Lanessman on anything you want ....they are all there at the top of Labour.

[JohnL]

The most anti Corbyn follower I have on Twitter is Labour (Blairite faction). He told me he wanted Corbyn destroyed (I had to say Theresa May isn't helping you is she)

But surely people must give Corbyn some respect for tenacity at least - he just won't let go, ever. He's 68 too and seems to have energy levels of a twenty something.

[Borky]

*needs to make point*

*drags up historical fact*

*Pushes chair away from laptop*

*Folds arms / nods to self*

Do you really think that Stalin defeating the Boche or the Mao 70/30 rule has any relevance in GE 2017 ? Seriously ? You can make a better show of it than this surely

This however is fascinating

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-polarisation-of-party-supporters-since-2015/?utm_content=buffer24bca&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

[DuncanW]

Though not necessarily the recall capacity for numbers...

[JohnL]

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Though not necessarily the recall capacity for

> numbers...

that's what iPads are for :)

[????]

I am thinking that an episode of "Wife Swap" with Boris and Diane could make good TV

[JohnL]

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am thinking that an episode of "Wife Swap" with

> Boris and Diane could make good TV

They'd both think they were cleverer than the other.

Like Laurel and Hardy.

[JoeLeg]

Borky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> for an intelligent man, you seem to have a very

> poor grasp of the reality of the mindset of the

> political class vermin (No offence blates)

Are you talking to me? Cos I'd say I understand the political mindset fairly well, doesn't mean that I can't still be exasperated by the constant idiocy of some (most) of them. Dianne Abbott is pretty much top of my list of 'why the fuck does anyone think she's any good?!'

[KalamityKel]

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and some of them are right up top of your party =

> policy, advisors, McDonnells secret army

Who didn't read that as MacDonalds? ^^^

[Earl Aelfheah]

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > and some of them are right up top of your party

> =

> > policy, advisors, McDonnells secret army

>

>

> Who didn't read that as MacDonalds? ^^^

Watch out for Hamburglar.

[Earl Aelfheah]

Kier Starmer and Emily Thornberry are very competent and I'd trust them to lead constructive Brexit negotiations above May, Boris and Hammond frankly.

[Winder]

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Kier Starmer and Emily Thornberry are very

> competent and I'd trust them to lead constructive

> Brexit negotiations above May, Boris and Hammond

> frankly.

Listened to him also but he failed to defend the soft line he has taken in the past with with terror suspects. He was against deportation for example. When he was at DPP he was a disaster.

He is out of touch with today's realities eg 3 major attacks in 3 months in the UK.

I appreciate you are keen to favour us all with your views with all in your eagerness but maybe you should have put your post in another thread 'cos this is about political posters in windows

[Earl Aelfheah]

Winder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Kier Starmer and Emily Thornberry are very

> > competent and I'd trust them to lead

> constructive

> > Brexit negotiations above May, Boris and

> Hammond

> > frankly.

>

> Listened to him also but he failed to defend the

> soft line he has taken in the past with with

> terror suspects. He was against deportation for

> example. When he was at DPP he was a disaster.

>

> He is out of touch with today's realities eg 3

> major attacks in 3 months in the UK.

>

> I appreciate you are keen to favour us all with

> your views with all in your eagerness but maybe

> you should have put your post in another thread

> 'cos this is about political posters in windows

I was talking about Brexit negotiations. But on the terrorist threat - May watered down many of the anti terror measures brought in by the last Labour government (for example control orders, 48 day detention, huge cuts to the security services), so not sure her record is great in that respect.

[JoeLeg]

"3 major attacks in 3 months in the UK."

Let's be honest; it's one major attack - Manchester.

Westminster and London Bridge were tragic events but they can hardly be placed on the same scale. To me mind they epitomise the desperation these pathetic individuals are sinking to in a vain attempt to be seen as something more than the murderers they are.

I don't say that there's some magic number or level of damage which defines the line between minor and major, but I do think that if you're reduced to hiring a van and picking up knives then it says a lot about your ability as a "terrorist".

[Jeremy]

Yep... as Andrew Neil said, pathetic Pound Shop terrorists.

[Earl Aelfheah]

Apparently the problem is the human rights act.?!?! I mean reLly, wtf?

[Borky]

*some random quote by some man/ woman about the example of country leader curtailing human rights an using the safety of the citizens as justification*

*gap for impact*

*Punchline reveals that country and leader behind was actually _ _ _ _ _ _ *

*gasps of shock*

*copies and posts on facebook*

[Earl Aelfheah]

Come on, May saying she'll 'rip up the human rights act' is just ridiculous politicking and has no bearing on what's happened. How about properly funding the security services as a start

[Trinnydad]

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on, May saying she'll 'rip up the human

> rights act' is just ridiculous politicking and has

> no bearing on what's happened.

Naturally, she's wanting to hoover up the Kipper votes.

[Green Goose]

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on, May saying she'll 'rip up the human

> rights act' is just ridiculous politicking and has

> no bearing on what's happened. How about properly

> funding the security services as a start

Good of you to raise the issue of security services. Here's a little press cutting from November 2016. Is this what we can expect if JC and Mcdonnell get in?

John McDonnell, Labour's shadow chancellor, called for MI5 and the UK's armed police force to be scrapped in a controversial campaign letter.

It demands that special police squads - like those that hunt terror suspects - be disbanded, as well as the Monarchy and the House of Lords.

The letter, organised by The Socialist Network as part of their ?Socialist Campaign For a Labour Victory? was also signed by a group of Labour-supporting unions.

In a tweet accompanying a picture of him holding the list of demands Labour's shadow chancellor said the campaign: "Is important for ensuring a clear program of socialist demands on a Labour government".

http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t643/savedelhi/Public%20Album/odonnel_zpsjwmttowk.jpg

[JoeLeg]

If they actually got in (which they won't), they'd never, ever be allowed to even think about that. Just not going to happen, and nor should it.

[Trinnydad]

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If they actually got in (which they won't), they'd

> never, ever be allowed to even think about that.

> Just not going to happen, and nor should it.

Heaven forbid! But leopards cannot and do not change their spots.

An unholy troika would be JC, Jon McDonnell and Andrew Murray as their adviser.

And of course Daine in support to give it some anti-white retoric plus a massive dose of hypocracy.

[JohnL]

Trinnydad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Come on, May saying she'll 'rip up the human

> > rights act' is just ridiculous politicking and

> has

> > no bearing on what's happened.

>

> Naturally, she's wanting to hoover up the Kipper

> votes.

But she can't just say it to pick up votes then not do it .... can she :) ?

[Earl Aelfheah]

Green Goose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Come on, May saying she'll 'rip up the human

> > rights act' is just ridiculous politicking and

> has

> > no bearing on what's happened. How about

> properly

> > funding the security services as a start

>

> Good of you to raise the issue of security

> services. Here's a little press cutting from

> November 2016. Is this what we can expect if JC

> and Mcdonnell get in?

>

> John McDonnell, Labour's shadow chancellor, called

> for MI5 and the UK's armed police force to be

> scrapped in a controversial campaign letter.

>

> It demands that special police squads - like those

> that hunt terror suspects - be disbanded, as well

> as the Monarchy and the House of Lords.

>

> The letter, organised by The Socialist Network as

> part of their ?Socialist Campaign For a Labour

> Victory? was also signed by a group of

> Labour-supporting unions.

>

> In a tweet accompanying a picture of him holding

> the list of demands Labour's shadow chancellor

> said the campaign: "Is important for ensuring a

> clear program of socialist demands on a Labour

> government".

>

> http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t643/savedelhi

> /Public%20Album/odonnel_zpsjwmttowk.jpg

From the Mail?

[Borky]

a atrawman too far.