Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The toad was recently asked by a scientist:


?How do you measure uncertainty?? I responded with ?fixed and variables?. This is an everyday question we ask ourselves to quantify the day ahead, our security, through to our future plans.


She then expanded and said that this is a question she askes Ministers when they consided new plans.....


How do you measure uncertainty?


TLT

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15636-how-do-you-measure-uncertainty/
Share on other sites

Hmmm, interesting one this.


Multidisciplinary.


I suppose the answer to your question is you can't measure uncertainty. To measure implies a known, or agreed, standard of measurement. Uncertainty, by definition, can't be quantified. Prima facie, the question is illogical.


BUT, science tells us a cat can be both alive or dead at the same time depending on the observer and that an electron can be in two places at the same time.


So the question isn't as daft as it first appears.


However I'd advise your scientist to keep ministers out of the debate otherwise therein the road to madness lies

I think that Infinity, by definition, IS a measurement, though not one that has a set numemical value but more a property or behaviour that is defined. ie. never ending and therefore perpetual, a bit like mathematical limits where you don't get an exact number as the answer but a 'tendency' towards a sepcific (range of) number(s).

As soon as Schr?dinger's cat observes Chick - that's lunch sorted. No uncertainty there! (I taut I thaw a puddy tat!)


Seriously, if you do look up Schr?dinger's cat you have a 50:50 chance of finding it dead - best not go there.


Sadly - attempting to measure uncertainty has killed more cats than any other scientific experiment. Be nice - don?t open the box!

Using a 'Starting Point' is an automatic action by us all - and starts at 50-50.


1. When you cycle through a GREEN traffic light at a 4-way junction you are pretty certain you will not be hit by a car (on your Left or Right hand side) as they are at a RED light. But what stops them, as a RED light is purely a symbolic function?


2. However, the same set of lights, a pedestrian crossing when the green man appears (and I don't mean from Mars) stands a greater chance of being hit by a cyclist, yet..... its the same symbolic function?


Unfortunately, more incidents with cyclist will help with this measurement of uncertainty.



TLT

First, you get some training in statistics, so that you can understand and apply probability theory, statistical mechanics, decision theory etc.


The scientist's question was rhetorical: she will of course have a thorough grounding in statistics, probability, risk, uncertainty... as part of her scientific training. The problem with most politicians is they don't have a clue. So the question is an interesting one to ask, to determine whether they have any sound framework at all for arriving at decisions.

> Unfortunately, more incidents with cyclist will

> help with this measurement of uncertainty.



Wouldn't different categories of uncertainty be subject to different methods of measurement?


To me, there are different classes of uncertainty. E.g., I view the uncertainty alluded to immediately above as being of the variety which becomes more certain with experimentation. Whereas, where in the OP you talk of "fixed and variables", this type of uncertainty would become more certain with the application of probability and chance? No?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Moving into a new place and need both a wardrobe and a chest of drawers, ideally collection Friday. Thanks!
    • Lordship Lane has two dry cleaners, three pizza places and an Italian selling pizza, two burger places, three bakeries, two hardware (ish, I'm thinking AJ Farmer here), God knows how many coffee and charity shops, two Italians, three nail salons, five wine shops... Where was the abject outrage when Dynamic Vines opened up literally next door to Cave de Bruno? But I don't see his customers decamped next door - no, those stalwarts are still out in force every night.  In Roman times all businesses were clustered by product. It's what kept prices down. Same in any market you go to abroad, they're all selling the same things next to each other.  Why is everyone being so hard on this new place? It's called healthy competition - you can't curtail the expansion of your business on the basis you that might hurt someone else's. 
    • I have a new fixation so any available, please let me know.  Thanks.
    • In restaurant terms I would say a chain manifests when the motivation is no longer “we are a couple/small group who have an idea and love food” who open a restaurant, them another and then a few more BUT THEN PIVOT to “we need capital to rollout out new restaurants so we have leveraged the help of the following investors”  that is the moment it stops being about the chef/food on the plate and becomes about the spreadsheet  so it is POSSIBLE  for a restaurant to have 50 branches and not be a chain - but I can’t think of any  I don’t know chango - by based on the number of outlets they appear to have just crossed/or are about to cross that line 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...