Jump to content

How do you measure uncertainty?

Lying Toad

By Lying Toad
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Lying Toad

Lying Toad

Posted
Posted

The toad was recently asked by a scientist:


?How do you measure uncertainty?? I responded with ?fixed and variables?. This is an everyday question we ask ourselves to quantify the day ahead, our security, through to our future plans.


She then expanded and said that this is a question she askes Ministers when they consided new plans.....


How do you measure uncertainty?


TLT

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15636-how-do-you-measure-uncertainty/
Share on other sites
keano77

keano77

Posted
Posted

Hmmm, interesting one this.


Multidisciplinary.


I suppose the answer to your question is you can't measure uncertainty. To measure implies a known, or agreed, standard of measurement. Uncertainty, by definition, can't be quantified. Prima facie, the question is illogical.


BUT, science tells us a cat can be both alive or dead at the same time depending on the observer and that an electron can be in two places at the same time.


So the question isn't as daft as it first appears.


However I'd advise your scientist to keep ministers out of the debate otherwise therein the road to madness lies

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted
I think that Infinity, by definition, IS a measurement, though not one that has a set numemical value but more a property or behaviour that is defined. ie. never ending and therefore perpetual, a bit like mathematical limits where you don't get an exact number as the answer but a 'tendency' towards a sepcific (range of) number(s).
HAL9000

HAL9000

Posted
Posted

As soon as Schr?dinger's cat observes Chick - that's lunch sorted. No uncertainty there! (I taut I thaw a puddy tat!)


Seriously, if you do look up Schr?dinger's cat you have a 50:50 chance of finding it dead - best not go there.


Sadly - attempting to measure uncertainty has killed more cats than any other scientific experiment. Be nice - don?t open the box!

Lying Toad

Lying Toad

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Using a 'Starting Point' is an automatic action by us all - and starts at 50-50.


1. When you cycle through a GREEN traffic light at a 4-way junction you are pretty certain you will not be hit by a car (on your Left or Right hand side) as they are at a RED light. But what stops them, as a RED light is purely a symbolic function?


2. However, the same set of lights, a pedestrian crossing when the green man appears (and I don't mean from Mars) stands a greater chance of being hit by a cyclist, yet..... its the same symbolic function?


Unfortunately, more incidents with cyclist will help with this measurement of uncertainty.



TLT

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted

First, you get some training in statistics, so that you can understand and apply probability theory, statistical mechanics, decision theory etc.


The scientist's question was rhetorical: she will of course have a thorough grounding in statistics, probability, risk, uncertainty... as part of her scientific training. The problem with most politicians is they don't have a clue. So the question is an interesting one to ask, to determine whether they have any sound framework at all for arriving at decisions.

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

> Unfortunately, more incidents with cyclist will

> help with this measurement of uncertainty.



Wouldn't different categories of uncertainty be subject to different methods of measurement?


To me, there are different classes of uncertainty. E.g., I view the uncertainty alluded to immediately above as being of the variety which becomes more certain with experimentation. Whereas, where in the OP you talk of "fixed and variables", this type of uncertainty would become more certain with the application of probability and chance? No?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Forest Hill Climber
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By Forest Hill Climber · Posted

      In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River. When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • DulwichParker
      Local plumber and gas engineer - Jafar - Portrait Plumbing

      By DulwichParker · Posted

      Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • Sue Klein
      Are we now under a flight path?

      By Sue Klein · Posted

      I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
    • Jenijenjen
      The Chapel of Rest

      By Jenijenjen · Posted

      Robert Redford

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...