Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The toad was recently asked by a scientist:


?How do you measure uncertainty?? I responded with ?fixed and variables?. This is an everyday question we ask ourselves to quantify the day ahead, our security, through to our future plans.


She then expanded and said that this is a question she askes Ministers when they consided new plans.....


How do you measure uncertainty?


TLT

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15636-how-do-you-measure-uncertainty/
Share on other sites

Hmmm, interesting one this.


Multidisciplinary.


I suppose the answer to your question is you can't measure uncertainty. To measure implies a known, or agreed, standard of measurement. Uncertainty, by definition, can't be quantified. Prima facie, the question is illogical.


BUT, science tells us a cat can be both alive or dead at the same time depending on the observer and that an electron can be in two places at the same time.


So the question isn't as daft as it first appears.


However I'd advise your scientist to keep ministers out of the debate otherwise therein the road to madness lies

I think that Infinity, by definition, IS a measurement, though not one that has a set numemical value but more a property or behaviour that is defined. ie. never ending and therefore perpetual, a bit like mathematical limits where you don't get an exact number as the answer but a 'tendency' towards a sepcific (range of) number(s).

As soon as Schr?dinger's cat observes Chick - that's lunch sorted. No uncertainty there! (I taut I thaw a puddy tat!)


Seriously, if you do look up Schr?dinger's cat you have a 50:50 chance of finding it dead - best not go there.


Sadly - attempting to measure uncertainty has killed more cats than any other scientific experiment. Be nice - don?t open the box!

Using a 'Starting Point' is an automatic action by us all - and starts at 50-50.


1. When you cycle through a GREEN traffic light at a 4-way junction you are pretty certain you will not be hit by a car (on your Left or Right hand side) as they are at a RED light. But what stops them, as a RED light is purely a symbolic function?


2. However, the same set of lights, a pedestrian crossing when the green man appears (and I don't mean from Mars) stands a greater chance of being hit by a cyclist, yet..... its the same symbolic function?


Unfortunately, more incidents with cyclist will help with this measurement of uncertainty.



TLT

First, you get some training in statistics, so that you can understand and apply probability theory, statistical mechanics, decision theory etc.


The scientist's question was rhetorical: she will of course have a thorough grounding in statistics, probability, risk, uncertainty... as part of her scientific training. The problem with most politicians is they don't have a clue. So the question is an interesting one to ask, to determine whether they have any sound framework at all for arriving at decisions.

> Unfortunately, more incidents with cyclist will

> help with this measurement of uncertainty.



Wouldn't different categories of uncertainty be subject to different methods of measurement?


To me, there are different classes of uncertainty. E.g., I view the uncertainty alluded to immediately above as being of the variety which becomes more certain with experimentation. Whereas, where in the OP you talk of "fixed and variables", this type of uncertainty would become more certain with the application of probability and chance? No?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...