Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, maybe and maybe not. The idea that a ?deal went sour? and someone got killed as a result really isn?t that far-fetched, when you think about all the stuff we know humans will do to each other in pursuit of power and money.


That said, rocking up in front of a Select Commitee with pink hair and an admiral that he heard it all from a mate...

  • 4 weeks later...

It's OK. Dave on Twitter, has this all covered.


Chuka Umunna on @SkyNews going on about letting the people decide the type of Brexit we finish up with. The people have already decided Chuka. Brexit that means Brexit. Simple.— Dave Roberts.🇬🇧 (@Bolddigger52) April 20, 2018

 

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dave is one of many similarly inclined on Twitter.

> He can deal with simple but not so good with

> slightly complicated.


brand him thick in your verbose way...typical- I expect he is a racist too!

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Dave is one of many similarly inclined on

> Twitter.

> > He can deal with simple but not so good with

> > slightly complicated.

>

> brand him thick in your verbose way...typical- I

> expect he is a racist too!


Well, odds are...


ETA, yep, scrolling through his Twitter feed he has an inglorious history of retweeting and supporting far right and racist organizations, so well done, Uncle, just for once you're right!

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We need to vote on local issues. Both the main

> parties appear to have very similar views on

> Brexit as far as I can see.


I think staying in the customs union or leaving it represents fairly clear water!

If you're a remainer (I'm not but most of you on the EDF are of course) then I'd say this is a very good thing. Feels like where we finally need to be after a crazily simplistic vote. Yes or no, imagine the arrogance of that stupid man Cameron, who thought he had it in the bag so much as to guarantee himself a win on a referendum that would put the issue to bed forever. He didn't half read the people wrong....


EDOdlie says both the main parties appear to have very similar views on Brexit, but I don't think this is right. And I don't think that there's internal consistency on both sides either* So if the Commons are to influence the final negotiations (which sound very complicated!) surely this is a chance for democracy to prove itself?


*Please say how this might be "remedied"

David?s got one last ?big job? in him apparently. After playing bluff with so many people?s lives he seems to think he?s got something more up there in his butternut squash of a head to give.


https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/03/life-after-no-10-is-not-what-david-cameron-was-hoping-for/


He?s always got religion to turn to I suppose, eventually.

The Express (and Daily Star) got taken over by Trinity Mirror (the new company is called "Reach"). The editors of both Express and Star resigned the day after the takeover and got replaced by Mirror staffers but the editorial leanings of the Express were staying the same.


The Express now just seems to be trying to wind Leavers up IMHO


https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/953400/Brexit-news-latest-Jacob-Rees-Mogg-blasts-Theresa-May-European-Union-agreement


"Mrs May has told ministers Britain could ?potentially? sign up to an association agreement with the bitter bloc."

"The Remoaner victory marks the seventh time Mrs May has been defeated in the House of Lords on the EU Withdrawal Bill."

"Jamie Oliver blames Brexit and May for overweight British children"

"No-deal divorce 'could net UK ?651BN haul' and hit EU with devastating loses(sp)"

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Express (and Daily Star) got taken over by

> Trinity Mirror (the new company is called

> "Reach"). The editors of both Express and Star

> resigned the day after the takeover and got

> replaced by Mirror staffers but the editorial

> leanings of the Express were staying the same.

>

> The Express now just seems to be trying to wind

> Leavers up IMHO

>


The Express is so desperate for readership that it will print practically anything. Stringent Leavers who don?t have the ability to think for themselves are it?s principle market now.


I know several Leavers who all admit they are embarrassed every time the Express runs one of it's lunatic headlines. While they steadfastly defend their position in an argument, they all feel the Express does way more harm than good for their cause.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you're a remainer (I'm not but most of you on

> the EDF are of course) then I'd say this is a very

> good thing. Feels like where we finally need to be

> after a crazily simplistic vote. Yes or no,

> imagine the arrogance of that stupid man Cameron,

> who thought he had it in the bag so much as to

> guarantee himself a win on a referendum that would

> put the issue to bed forever. He didn't half read

> the people wrong....

>

> EDOdlie says both the main parties appear to have

> very similar views on Brexit, but I don't think

> this is right. And I don't think that there's

> internal consistency on both sides either* So if

> the Commons are to influence the final

> negotiations (which sound very complicated!)

> surely this is a chance for democracy to prove

> itself?

>

> *Please say how this might be "remedied"


Cameron had no choice but to call a referendum. His whole election campaign was based on that promise and he had no choice but to resign when it didn't go his way.


The Labour Party & the Conservative party want us to leave it seems to me, neither has said that they wouldn't. It also sems to me that if we don't leave the single market and the customs union we are not really leavimg. The only parties that have actively campaigned to remain are the Greens and the Lib Dems. So it seems entirely logical that if you want to stay in the EU you should vote either Green or Lib Dem. Am I missing something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...