Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, maybe and maybe not. The idea that a ?deal went sour? and someone got killed as a result really isn?t that far-fetched, when you think about all the stuff we know humans will do to each other in pursuit of power and money.


That said, rocking up in front of a Select Commitee with pink hair and an admiral that he heard it all from a mate...

  • 4 weeks later...

It's OK. Dave on Twitter, has this all covered.


Chuka Umunna on @SkyNews going on about letting the people decide the type of Brexit we finish up with. The people have already decided Chuka. Brexit that means Brexit. Simple.— Dave Roberts.🇬🇧 (@Bolddigger52) April 20, 2018

 

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dave is one of many similarly inclined on Twitter.

> He can deal with simple but not so good with

> slightly complicated.


brand him thick in your verbose way...typical- I expect he is a racist too!

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Dave is one of many similarly inclined on

> Twitter.

> > He can deal with simple but not so good with

> > slightly complicated.

>

> brand him thick in your verbose way...typical- I

> expect he is a racist too!


Well, odds are...


ETA, yep, scrolling through his Twitter feed he has an inglorious history of retweeting and supporting far right and racist organizations, so well done, Uncle, just for once you're right!

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We need to vote on local issues. Both the main

> parties appear to have very similar views on

> Brexit as far as I can see.


I think staying in the customs union or leaving it represents fairly clear water!

If you're a remainer (I'm not but most of you on the EDF are of course) then I'd say this is a very good thing. Feels like where we finally need to be after a crazily simplistic vote. Yes or no, imagine the arrogance of that stupid man Cameron, who thought he had it in the bag so much as to guarantee himself a win on a referendum that would put the issue to bed forever. He didn't half read the people wrong....


EDOdlie says both the main parties appear to have very similar views on Brexit, but I don't think this is right. And I don't think that there's internal consistency on both sides either* So if the Commons are to influence the final negotiations (which sound very complicated!) surely this is a chance for democracy to prove itself?


*Please say how this might be "remedied"

David?s got one last ?big job? in him apparently. After playing bluff with so many people?s lives he seems to think he?s got something more up there in his butternut squash of a head to give.


https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/03/life-after-no-10-is-not-what-david-cameron-was-hoping-for/


He?s always got religion to turn to I suppose, eventually.

The Express (and Daily Star) got taken over by Trinity Mirror (the new company is called "Reach"). The editors of both Express and Star resigned the day after the takeover and got replaced by Mirror staffers but the editorial leanings of the Express were staying the same.


The Express now just seems to be trying to wind Leavers up IMHO


https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/953400/Brexit-news-latest-Jacob-Rees-Mogg-blasts-Theresa-May-European-Union-agreement


"Mrs May has told ministers Britain could ?potentially? sign up to an association agreement with the bitter bloc."

"The Remoaner victory marks the seventh time Mrs May has been defeated in the House of Lords on the EU Withdrawal Bill."

"Jamie Oliver blames Brexit and May for overweight British children"

"No-deal divorce 'could net UK ?651BN haul' and hit EU with devastating loses(sp)"

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Express (and Daily Star) got taken over by

> Trinity Mirror (the new company is called

> "Reach"). The editors of both Express and Star

> resigned the day after the takeover and got

> replaced by Mirror staffers but the editorial

> leanings of the Express were staying the same.

>

> The Express now just seems to be trying to wind

> Leavers up IMHO

>


The Express is so desperate for readership that it will print practically anything. Stringent Leavers who don?t have the ability to think for themselves are it?s principle market now.


I know several Leavers who all admit they are embarrassed every time the Express runs one of it's lunatic headlines. While they steadfastly defend their position in an argument, they all feel the Express does way more harm than good for their cause.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you're a remainer (I'm not but most of you on

> the EDF are of course) then I'd say this is a very

> good thing. Feels like where we finally need to be

> after a crazily simplistic vote. Yes or no,

> imagine the arrogance of that stupid man Cameron,

> who thought he had it in the bag so much as to

> guarantee himself a win on a referendum that would

> put the issue to bed forever. He didn't half read

> the people wrong....

>

> EDOdlie says both the main parties appear to have

> very similar views on Brexit, but I don't think

> this is right. And I don't think that there's

> internal consistency on both sides either* So if

> the Commons are to influence the final

> negotiations (which sound very complicated!)

> surely this is a chance for democracy to prove

> itself?

>

> *Please say how this might be "remedied"


Cameron had no choice but to call a referendum. His whole election campaign was based on that promise and he had no choice but to resign when it didn't go his way.


The Labour Party & the Conservative party want us to leave it seems to me, neither has said that they wouldn't. It also sems to me that if we don't leave the single market and the customs union we are not really leavimg. The only parties that have actively campaigned to remain are the Greens and the Lib Dems. So it seems entirely logical that if you want to stay in the EU you should vote either Green or Lib Dem. Am I missing something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...