Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Six left? Episodes 15,16 then 17,18 and 19.20 to come, so finale is Sat 26th March?


If any of you had a heart, at all, you could post a bit of an update for those of us who haven't seen anything since episode 8. For instance, who is Olav? Olav? Did you make him up?

Ive just caught up with ep 16 all the red herrings seem to be falling by the wayside as the jumper gets back on the case.

Lund is getting support in following up her new lead which is proving to be finally on the right track and seems to be shedding light on more then just Nannas murder. Olav was just a space filler and of not much importance apart from who he dealt with and the killer is close to being revealed with a big clue in this episode.

Er...we know there were two killers, and one has already been identified and done a suicide-by-cop! :)) The pattern thus far of this riveting series seems to be to introduce a new suspect/red herring at the start of alternate episodes, and show how he cannot be the culprit in the following episode. In between these 2 events we get to holler from behind the sofa at Lund for stupidly going into darkened, perilous buildings without back-up, flashlight, gun, portable nuclear weapon etc etc.


With just 2 hours to go I still think it could be Rie's dad!B)

  • 2 weeks later...
Sofie Gr?b?l was on Woman's Hour this morning. The audio interview's available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0100h4q . With Flash installed you can get to it directly as Chapter 1 at the bottom of the page. And series 3 starts shooting in August.
  • 4 months later...

Oh flipping heck.


Just getting my way through this, and then I saw a comment about series 2.


Is this going to be one of those silly bloody serials where you don't find out what happens before you've been dragged through several series of deteriorating quality and increasingly silly new characters?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...