Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob*, we don't actually know how many lasses have/had been fed similar lines. If you're plate spinning to the extent of going out/on holiday/shacking up with various ladies A, B, C etc., presumably they each need to be fed a line of some sort. At one point, having dashed back from holiday with one such lady in order to locate me at a particular place, he did admit to me he hadn't told her what he was up to and said she would be angry if she knew, so presumably some not very frank line had been peddled there.


I just find it very odd that someone should come out with the kind of stuff written to person A while moving in with person B.

Quite....something equally unfathomable happened to a friend of mine years ago. Her boyfriend propesed to her, and then two weeks later moved in with someone else. Some people I think, just crave attention without a thought for the feelings of the other person. It took her a long time to get over it.

I think some people need a Plan B (or C, D, etc) to accompany their main course, sort of a back-up. I guess that's an insecurity / attention-seeking problem.


I do not agree however with the automatic branding of a person as a failure if they've had 3x divorces. That's an ignorant generalisation. Seems like a self-satisfied know-it-all viewpoint.

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just find it very odd that someone should come

> out with the kind of stuff written to person A

> while moving in with person B.


Isn't person A posting a detailed private email from person B (who they are no longer in a relationship with) - onto a public forum, on the eve of Valentines Day.. also.. a bit odd?


Fun to read, of course. But for some reason I can't help thinking more about what is says about you for posting it than I am about him for writing it.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think some people need a Plan B (or C, D, etc)

> to accompany their main course, sort of a back-up.

> I guess that's an insecurity / attention-seeking

> problem.


I had myself reached the conclusion that there are some people who cannot be alone, at all. Period. I hadn't realised that.


>

> I do not agree however with the automatic branding

> of a person as a failure if they've had 3x

> divorces. That's an ignorant generalisation.

> Seems like a self-satisfied know-it-all viewpoint.


I agree. Which is why I gave him the benefit of the doubt over several years. The quality of the marriage is more indicative than the number, mebbee? (However, in hindsight, it did feel like a bit of a 'beware' that I hadn't given sufficient weight to.)

All that three divorces means is three failed relationships. Some people marry whereas others just live together. I think that 'some people just can't ever be alone' is probably the truest observation. We all know people like that and they are also the people who easily jump ship when someone more appealing comes along. And I personally avoid them like the Plague.
Poor you. Some people (male and female) are just in love with falling in love - with the heightened sense of themselves that it gives them. Think it's a kind of narcissism. I've learned to be suspicious of anyone who has a history of seamless or overlapping relationships.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Poor you. Some people (male and female) are just

> in love with falling in love - with the heightened

> sense of themselves that it gives them. Think it's

> a kind of narcissism. I've learned to be

> suspicious of anyone who has a history of seamless

> or overlapping relationships


Agree

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Of all the relationships and marriages I've had

> over my life

> > so far, no one has touched me so deeply as you

> did.

>

> Give me his phone number, he ain't seen nothing

> yet.


> Nette.

>

> :)

> (td)


Are you related to Paula by any chance?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I got this  interesting email today. At least some (albeit apparently very few) shoplifters seem to have been arrested, though I wonder what the criteria were. Obviously that is only the ones arrested as a result of this particular initiative. Met Engage Logo Joint Partnership Success – Operation Roscoea, Southwark We’re pleased to share the success of Operation Roscoea, a joint partnership anti-social behaviour (ASB) initiative carried out in Southwark last week. This multi-agency operation saw eight partner representatives from six support organisations conducting outreach patrols alongside officers from our Trust, Confidence and Engagement Team. These joint efforts led to numerous new referrals into support services, ensuring vulnerable individuals are connected with the help they need. Neighbourhood policing teams also carried out joint patrols with Southwark Council wardens, who now hold newly designated enforcement powers. This enhanced collaboration has strengthened our collective ability to respond to ASB and community concerns. Operational highlights included: Six arrests made by officers from North Southwark Town Centre Team, St George’s, North Walworth, Faraday, Newington Ward, Chaucer, and the Proactive Crime Team: 2 for possession of a Section 5 firearm (CS spray) 1 for possession of Class A and B drugs 1 individual wanted for theft 2 for shoplifting ASB enforcement activity included: 2 Community Protection Notices issued to persistent offenders Numerous intelligence reports submitted to support ongoing investigations This operation is a testament to the dedication and teamwork of our local officers and partner agencies. Thank you to everyone involved for your continued commitment to making Southwark safer and more resilient. We look forward to building on this momentum in future deployments. Message Sent By Gary Thomson (Metropolitan Police, DC - Staff Officer to Superintendent Brockway, Southwark) You are receiving this message because you are registered on Met Engage. 
    • I've seen it in the same place the past two Fridays. I'm assuming it's some sand that's left over from when the old sand filters failed. When that happened there was lots of sand on the bottom. I'm guessing it'll only go if they use a pool vacuum to clean the bottom.
    • Maybe because you would have thought such an incident  would have been publicised, or  someone on here would know what it was? On the face of it it seems odd, especially if they were on blues and twos, if there was no serious  reason for it. Unless, as I said, it was some kind of training exercise?
    • If true I was told that the new swimming pool at Canada Water is also closed and will not open until end November/December due to problems.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...