Jump to content

Dedicated to lovers everywhere

louisiana

By louisiana
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

the-ex

the-ex

Posted
Posted

I sent you my most personal and deeply intimate email (ever) and two months later you post it almost verbatim on a public internet forum! Nice work, I hope you're proud of yourself. I think it's quite contemptible and says more about you than you probably intended.


Of course you missed out the last paragraph....


---

This took guts to write and I hope you will give me some credit for

that. Please, whatever you decide, I'd be grateful if you would

preserve my dignity and keep this letter just between you and I.


As ever, sent with love.

---


I feel personally violated, and of course given that you know I read this forum that was clearly your malicious intention. You absolutely disgust me. I could retaliate but that's not in my nature. You're not worth it.


I was the friend you called last week, the friend who (realising you were "tired and emotional") let you cry down the phone for more than an hour about some guy getting killed on the 176. Don't ever ring me again, you'll get a less accommodating response.


I'll be writing to the moderators about your post, you had no right to quote my email in any shape or form.


PS For those of you who felt the need to pick up and throw stones, let me just say there are two sides to any story and you know nothing about me. Shame on you. Suffice to say L has been selective in her postings but I have no intention of saying any more. It's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
legalbeagle

legalbeagle

Posted
Posted

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I want to know which way legalbeagle is swinging

> now? LB?


Swinging wildly between "hmmmm it was a bit mean to post his email up here", and "He must have been horrible to her if she was prepared to post that".


Honestly have no idea where I'll settle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scribe

Scribe

Posted
Posted


I don't think anyone did, Jeremy. But to get a good idea of who may be responsible for what is quite clearly a hoax, you're best off reading back through the thread, and searching for the post that betrayed the most protest at revealing what is supposedly a very private correspondence. So far the only really indignant reply I can find is this:




I'm not saying that I'm certain, as I could quite easily be wrong. But it's a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the-ex

the-ex

Posted
Posted

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I could retaliate but that's not in my nature."

>

> Surely you just did?


No, I felt I had the right to respond. Posting up personal emails would have been retaliation.



Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Reads the forum but only that one post. Bogus.


I had to sign up to make that response. Think what you like.



cincinatti kid Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think this is genuine?

> The whole thing seems a bit weird.


The lady herself will confirm authenticity. I agree, it's weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
legalbeagle

legalbeagle

Posted
Posted
Agree with that. The-ex, if you really are real, and mortified, and angry, and want this to go away then don't come back on and comment. You're just giving it legs. Of course you can do what you like, but I'm just saying that the longer you're on here the longer this will take to die........
Link to comment
Share on other sites
the-ex

the-ex

Posted
Posted

I am all of the above - very real, intensely mortified and **** angry. I have no intention of adding any facts to this sorry debacle for everyone's entertainment, I'm waiting for the mod to respond and remove the original post.


This should never have happened. It's quite sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • kford
      Here it is - thanks to all on the forum who helped us create a history of ed's home, 41 North Cross Rd

      By kford · Posted

      Good effort!
    • Rockets
      One (part of) Dulwich

      By Rockets · Posted

      Well worth signing up to become a "supporter" as they send their updates and often shed light on things the council and their supporters would rather didn't get too much attention! https://www.onedulwich.uk/get-involved
    • Rockets
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Rockets · Posted

      Spot on...and they rant against "anonymous" groups like One Dulwich and then post missives from "anonymous" lobby groups like Clean Air Dulwich without any sense of hypocrisy or irony...
    • Penguin68
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Penguin68 · Posted

      The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...