Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Hollie,


I got mine by contacting PALS > http://www.kch.nhs.uk/patients/services/pals/


They emailed me a form, I filled it out and took it in and paid my 25 smackers. I opted to pick mine up rather than have them sent, and this speeded up the process- took about 10 days to get mine and I collected them straight from PALS.

I asked about this at Kings when I was in for an outpatient appt a few months ago as I had a very difficult birth last June and wanted a copy of the notes for future reference. They told me it would be ?50 to get a get a copy which I thought was outrageous so I didn't bother. I'll follow up with PALS though as someone above was told it was ?25 which I would be prepared to pay.

marrybatth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a professional London Interior Designer, I meet

> with clients all the time who simply crave more

> originality and personality in their interior

> spaces.


Is this some sort of code re *ahem* a bit of damage to the undercarriage post-birth? ! :-)

You have a right to see your maternity notes by making a request under the Data Protection Act. This can be subject to a maximum fee of ?50 (if its entirely an electronic record) but DH guidance clearly states that "any charges for access requests should not be made in order to make a financial gain". I'd be asking fairly searching questions on their justification for charging the max - particularly if other hospitals are charging less for comparable situations.
Hospitals just have to charge for extra services given that funding has been cut. Its not only staff time but the paper and toner too. Sounds petty, but sum it all up, per patient, and could come to a fair bit. "As someone here ones said it will be a beautiful day when the military has to have a cake sale for a new aircraft and a hospital gets all the equipment they need" or in this case toner and paper.

You might be right, Snowboarder, I remember hearing this somewhere. It is also sometimes possible to get a MW to go over your notes with you.


I got my notes to help me on the road to a successful VBAC and at 25pounds, if the VBAC is successful (+ve thoughts...) will be a small price to pay for it. Not sure I'd feel the same if it was 50 quid though...

I'm afraid that getting my notes, which were full of outright lies, made me feel worse. It wasn't until I was able to gatecrash a maternity services meeting and talk directly to the head of maternity services, and discovered that contrary to my notes, i was not the only person to complain about my awful, cruel and sadistic Kings midwives and that they had been disciplined and taken off night duties so they could be supervised properly, that I finally felt remotely vindicated and was able to get over the ghastly experience to some extent,and I would recommend this, even though my experience at Kings has given me a real empathy with victims of torture and imprisonment, and, years later, I am still completely claustrophobic.
I'd agree with the maternity notes thing. When I had my second child I was able to see what they had recorded about my first birth. It was utterly wrong in so many ways and I don't mena in terms of interpretation. For example, they had recorded that I had given birth at Mayday hospital in Croydon when I actually had a very starighhtforward home birth in East Dulwich with Brierley midwives ... certianly a worry if they are making decisons based on your previous medical history and the medical history is innaccurate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...