Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a child at the Charter and whilst mostly mostly positive, we are feeling quite let down with regards communication with the school. Is there anyone else out there who finds it difficult to be listened to.


The school constantly harps on about the parent/school partnership whilst seemingly ignoring any concerns we might have.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15864-charter-school-communication/
Share on other sites

I wonder which year your child/ children are in tivat? I only ask because we certainly found that the change from primary to secondary was marked for us by (amongst other things) less contact with the school for us as parents. So by the middle of year 7 I was feeling a little as you do now.


At secondary level the school tends to rely more on the children to communicate with us about school issues. This is good and bad i.e. the children quickly learn that they need to up their game or they miss out on stuff because their parents didn't know about it, but yes - sometimes stuff falls through the net. I have found that I also take more responsibility for finding out what's going on in the school by regularly checking their website and keeping my ear to the ground. Certainly in primary I was much more dependent on the regular letters home in the bookbag for communication, the lack of these combined with no-longer actually being present in the playground (it's probably not even called that at secondary school) meant that I/we had to get used to a different way of operating with regard to school communications.


From asking around though I think that this is common at Secondary level.

We're really happy with that level of communication, re school events etc. Apart from perhaps the website!!


No, its just trying to get in touch with teachers with regards discipline etc., its as if you can't question or challenge anything ,and getting any response to letters emails etc. is very difficult. It makes us feel very vulnerable and isolated, that's why I was wondering if anyone else had experienced issues like this, as it would be great to chat them through, in fact if anyone has a new kid at any secondary school I would love to hear if this is just normal at 'big' school


I don't want to put a downer on the school as most of it seems fantastic and our kid is really happy most of the time.

I have found that an email direct to the appropriate teacher, making sure to cc in the tutor, year head & key stage head to be the most effective way of getting a response. Also giving a polite time frame for expected response e.g.:I hope to hear back from you by Wednesday before I take this any further".
My stepdaughter is in Yr7 at another secondary school with a very good reputation and we've experienced similar frustrations. I do think it's down to the primary to secondary switch in most respects. There is though a real issue about getting hold of teachers sometimes - the head of year is definitely a good conduit on this - and on relying on a non-particularly communicative 11 year old for information. Hopefully we'll get used to it...

I thought also that tivat's post was partially parents adapting to ' Secondary School Life', but I would never undermine their anxieties.


It's a huge step jumping from primary to secondary. One of the aspects I missed was that regular drop off ( if not pick up), you could always have with the teacher if needed. You were also in regular contact with other parents. That doesn't really happen at secondary school and it's a big adjustment for us parents.


I don't have children at The Charter but would suggest that if your not receiving e-mails, texts from then they have no concerns.


I would suggest sending an e-mail to the head of year copied into the child's form teacher. They won't mind.


Good luck. If this has been tried already persist and escalate to deputy head.

I have a child in year 8 at Charter. I am happy with the level of communication re: specific concerns. I have been in email contact with several teachers and on one occasion, the year head has rang me back to discuss on phone too. I have found that my concerns have been forwarded to the relevant teachers and have been dealt with to my satisfaction.


I agree with others that it takes a while to get used to the more distant relationship you have with secondary school teachers and you have to rely on feedback from your children and also gut instinct to a certain extent.

Very much agree with the comments about feeling out of the loop once they start secondary school.


My son is in year 8 at Charter and I am more than happy with the communication I have had with the school, aside from the usual texts and letters, he was having a problem with another boy in his class which was causing him some upset, I called the school in the morning and explained the situation to someone in the office, they then passed a message to the behaviour officer, who spoke my son during the school day, I then got a call from his tutor after school to tell me what they were doing to rectify the problem. By the next day all was sorted and my son is now his happy self again.


I'm sorry you are having difficulties, perhaps give the school a call when they go back and ask for the tutor to call you back as soon as they can, if you don't have any luck I would probably then ask to speak to the head of year.


Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...