Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At least Oliver does something and endorses his own products so has a bit of industry about him.

Wright is just Wright, all matey loud and pointless - perfect for advertising sh!te.


There's been a lot of celeb endorsements recently, it's in vogue for supermarkets it seems. I loved/hated Denise Van Outen wandering through a field with a nicked trolley was taking it a little far though. Not a word of 'this is all muddy and the wheels don't work'.

I like him, think he's a nice character. He did this programme last year with a bunch of typical fat lazy kids where he tried to get them motivated to do a bit of sport. He seemed to really care, and was so frustrated both by the kids, and their parents who didn't seem to give a toss.


He is a bit of a wally at times, but a nice fella.


Think I'm right in saying Shaun is his adopted som, not his step son... Not sure though.

I saw him at Highbury - he's a brilliant actor. Went down clutching the back of his head claiming a coin had been thrown. After heroic recovery he got up massaging front of head. Paul Daniels must have been in the crowd: amazingly the referee could find no coin.

Keef, sorry but doing a program about helping overweight kids and then endorsing Kelloggs brilliantly cover all 'if you eat breakfast you'll be great at school' line seems hypocritical to me. That message and his grinning mug feature on coco pops boxes. Nice though coco pops might be, healthy they're not.


I would *love* to see Wrighty, Vorderman and Moyles tied together and chucked in the Thames. Too harsh? Answers to?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I read somewhere that it was to be an Orleans Smokehouse, opening in December, which seems unlikely
    • There are "plans" to build more reservoirs, with physical work yet to be started, with the first hoped to be completed by 2036, and a second by 2040, then time is needed for them to fill so add at least another 12 months on. However, if the 1.5 million homes are built by 2028, each averaging 2 people occupying them.(some will be more, some will be less) then thats 3 million people showering, bathing and using water.  Therefore there is a massive demand that will strain our current inferstructure between 2028 and 2037 (nearly ten years) plus all those homes will need electricity, as the ambition is to phase gas usage out, which will take just as much time to reinforce the network to cover, let alone add in the ability to cope with green production electricity that needs to be moved from wind and solar farms to where it is most needed.  Therefore, is the current plan to build more homes, regardless of where they are,  potentially going to have serious ramifications on already creaking networks ? 
    • SDCAS is doing important work and needs our help - please consider supporting them at this difficult time. 
    • Cheers for that. Surprising to see it's over 25 years since it closed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...