Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At least Oliver does something and endorses his own products so has a bit of industry about him.

Wright is just Wright, all matey loud and pointless - perfect for advertising sh!te.


There's been a lot of celeb endorsements recently, it's in vogue for supermarkets it seems. I loved/hated Denise Van Outen wandering through a field with a nicked trolley was taking it a little far though. Not a word of 'this is all muddy and the wheels don't work'.

I like him, think he's a nice character. He did this programme last year with a bunch of typical fat lazy kids where he tried to get them motivated to do a bit of sport. He seemed to really care, and was so frustrated both by the kids, and their parents who didn't seem to give a toss.


He is a bit of a wally at times, but a nice fella.


Think I'm right in saying Shaun is his adopted som, not his step son... Not sure though.

I saw him at Highbury - he's a brilliant actor. Went down clutching the back of his head claiming a coin had been thrown. After heroic recovery he got up massaging front of head. Paul Daniels must have been in the crowd: amazingly the referee could find no coin.

Keef, sorry but doing a program about helping overweight kids and then endorsing Kelloggs brilliantly cover all 'if you eat breakfast you'll be great at school' line seems hypocritical to me. That message and his grinning mug feature on coco pops boxes. Nice though coco pops might be, healthy they're not.


I would *love* to see Wrighty, Vorderman and Moyles tied together and chucked in the Thames. Too harsh? Answers to?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have no agenda just a simple response expressing my thoughts and experience.  
    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...