Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Time Out had some choice words in a brief article about him this week! Can't find it online and I don't have my copy here! Go and flick through one in your local newsagents!


P.S. They weren't particulary complimentary. I can't comment as I don't tend to keep up with the "young people's music".

Oh my god, seems I actually own some. It's on my Camden Crawl 2007 CD.

TBH it's harmless enough, he's not some manufactured nonsense, he didn't win a stupid talent show, just a lad who writes his own songs and managed to get noticed in a tough, sh!tty industry.

Good on him I say. It's not terrible either, just a little, forgettable.

Male Kate Nash sums it up nicely.

Of course Kate Nash is lovely, you just want to take her home to meet your mum; can't say the same of Jack

 

Well I never.

There I was thinking he was descended from a line of pen eaters, but it actually turns out he's Pe?ate, a half breed Spaniard from south east London descended from rock like people.


As our names translate to 'gracious rock' and 'stone sheep-path' respectively, I have to say I'm warming to the lad!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...