Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Following on from previous mugging post, my daughter was mugged by a hoodie and her iphone was snatched from her hand whilst she was talking, by a youngster age around 15 at 10.30pm last Tuesday. This occurrence is obviously become more frequent and we should all take care.

I think waving ?800 of phone around after dark has long been understood to be a beacon for muggers.




How does an item of clothing mug someone? I appreciate it may seem insensitive to be concerned about the hoodie but it makes me wonder that people are pigeonholed together by an item of clothing. I'm middle aged and middle class but I love a good hoodie as it keeps the rain and the cold out. Should I not wear them for fear of generalisations and negative associations.

I am the person who was mugged on Glengarry Road. I think people shouldn't be so daft as to be talking on their phone when walking around at night on their own, sorry. But I was mugged despite being wary, with my bag tightly close to my body over my shoulder and keys out ready to get into my house safe. Whoever it is was determined to steal my bag anyway, wrestling me to the ground and breaking the bag's strap to get it off me. I think people see anyone as a target, not just someone with valuables on display.
I do have sympathy for the OP's daughter, having made a similar mistake myself a few years ago. But it's really not a good idea to walk around talking on your phone - especially if it's worth several hundred pounds, and you're on your own at night.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do have sympathy for the OP's daughter, having

> made a similar mistake myself a few years ago. But

> it's really not a good idea to walk around talking

> on your phone - especially if it's worth several

> hundred pounds, and you're on your own at night.




So we all now need two phones - cheap one for talking on in public and our iPhone for functionality at home.


My elderly mother has an iPhone but no contract - it never leaves the house :)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So we all now need two phones - cheap one for talking

> on in public and our iPhone for functionality at home.


No, I would suggest not talking on your phone when you're on your own, in a quiet road, in the middle of the night.


If for some reason you feel that this is too restrictive, then I would suggest getting a cheap phone, and using your computer at home for browsing the internet and playing games.


At the end of the day, this is London, and everybody should take sensible precautions.

Unless you go out in barefoot, rags and with a couple of baked bean cans on a string ITS AT LEAST PARTLY YOUR FAULT.....APPARENTLY


Scummy lowlifes can really effect peoples lives in a horrible way for what for them is nothing and yet people somehow try and somehow deflect some of the blame on the victims.....unbelievable, wet liberal tosh...

This is not a laughing matter, but ???? you did just make me laugh. Of COURSE we can/should all be careful sensible etc etc but these things do happen. I will continue to walk around ED and answer my phone if I really want to. There are limits to what we can do before we become hermits! Sorry to hear this has happened but it's silly to blame the victim for answering the phone or the parent for not chaining kid to the bedroom!

????, wasn't trying to deflect the blame at all... of course it wasn't the victim's fault and I do have a lot of sympathy. It's a horrible thing to happen. But you have to be realistic, accept that these scumbags exist, and do what you can to minimise the risk to yourself and your property.


It was meant as constructive advice, if you want to twist it into "wet liberal tosh" then that's your problem.

It's awful to be mugged and how nasty for the OP's daughter but sometimes you do have to wonder at the behaviour of people in ED so I partly agree with Jeremy.


The other night on the way home, 11.30, I managed to see a chap on his iPhone, nice suit, standing in the middle of the road talking very loudly. If he had been mugged I would have not been surprised because he was advertising himself and his presence to all and sundry.


London has become very gentrified over the years but it is really worth remembering a bit of street sense sometimes.

Another important thread decending into a slanging match, can we not accept that people have different opinions and learn to bite our lips??


Unfortunately the lovely ED is down the road from some rather dodgy areas which harbour some VERY dodgy people so thefts/robberies of this nature will happen.


Can we have a description of suspect please so I can be on the lookout - I use CP Road on a daily basis so would like to know.


Ta

do the dodgy people have to come from outside of ED? I'm across the track in Peckham and we are getting a bit fed up with being denigrated in this way. We have lovely people around our way and a fervent neighbourhood watch.

Mugging is pretty opportunist and your crims most likely going along that way because its their locality and seeing their victim rather than hiking from over here. Complacency about 'lovely ED' makes you more vulnerable. There are a couple of roads in ED coming up again and again in these mugging threads and its naive to think the muggers are not from round there!

So where are these rather dodgy areas, let me see - Camberwell, Peckham, Nunhead, New Cross, Brockley, Forest hill, Sydenham, Tulse Hill, Brixton, Brockley, Lewisham, Kennington, Clapham, Norwood, Herne Hill, Walworth, Elephant and Castle, Waterloo, Catford...............

looks like you are on your own ED, be careful out there...oh, and keep em peeled

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...