Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Chinese teacher who has been teaching my son privately for the last 6 years has asked if I think parents would like to be offered classes for their primary children at Goodrich after school. This teacher and her colleague are young highly trained native speakers. Their lessons are top modern fun standard. And, if your child keeps it up, in Year 11 they can take the Chinese GCSE and have that important "edge" that might make all the difference. Chinese is going to be the world language with English of course in the future.

This "thread" is a test of the waters: What do you think? Would you be willing to have your child take Chinese after school at Goodrich for a few ?'s?

Would you like classes for yourself? For an older, Secondary aged child?

Give it a think and post here!

The BBC had a number of lessons on radio4 many years ago which I thought was an excellent idea,


until I discovered there were about 20 different ways of pronouncing the word 'OW'


and they all meant something different.


I was convinced from that day forth, I am no linguist.

Ni hao! Yes, I think this is a great idea. I seem to recall that there is already some Mandarin teaching going on at Goodrich but might be mistaken. I learnt Mandarin at university and lived in China for some time. Contrary to what many believe it is not difficult to learn containing virtually no grammar and is based on much simpler principles than any european language. Not sure how proficient GCSE Mandarin is, my memories of GCSE French are patchy but we got as far as learning how to ask for directions to the Gare du Nord. However, I do think that language learning is important and would support any local mandarin classes for children or adults. China is a world player and having an increasingly important role to play in such affairs, it is crucial that we have young people able to understand Mandarin and Chinese culture if we are to engage in a meaningful way. Anyone offering conversational Chinese for adults - I need to practise!

After 3 replies this dropped off everyone's radar. For interest alone I note that parents drive what children learn as England is currently run. For anyone reading this last note run your eye along what people want to talk about: new babies, cute babies, aches and pains, baby milestones, little babies. Babies are easy and fun. Instilling a love of learning and accepting family responsibility for how children learn is harder. As parents we demand learning from teachers like a commodity and when kids fall short it someone else's fault.


But in the end, or at the beginning, learning is what we ask our children to do and what we expect from them at home not only at school: Memorise your ABC's, Want to read and learn the basics, Times Tables to 12 by 12 memorised and always always ask questions and think and take responsibility for your own leaning and actions.


Schools will not teach Chinese unless parents ask. It is not that hard for a child to learn. NO GRAMMAR and the writing is pictures.


Just my opinion.

Mynamehere - not sure what you are getting at? The pupils at Goodrich have Chinese lessons in yr 5 and 6, so I'm sure the school would be interested in this. Why doesn't your teacher contact the school directly - they have an after school club coordinator who could talk to her about this.

The current obssession with teaching kids Chinese seems a little odd to me. Learning to speak basic Chinese phonetically may not be that hard, but learning to read/write Chinese to any kind of level is a pretty mammoth task.


Also, the rise of Chinese economic power has no correlation with a rise in the use of Chinese as a world language. The German economy is pretty strong but German businesses (like all other businesses the world over) regard English as the primary global language. I read recently that over 30% of science research papers from internationally recognised institutions are now published only in English, i.e. many scientists now decide not to bother publishing their research in their native language.


To anser the OP's question, I'm more interested in teaching my kids European languages, tbh.

I have to agree with DaveR. Learning French or Spanish must certainly be more useful when living in Europe than learning Mandarin. The only reason there is such a big push is that currently not many Mainland Chinese speak English, but this will very soon change and I dare say the Chinese are probably learning English faster than the world is learning Mandarin.


I am being hypocritical of course as my children take weekly mandarin lessons but they're part Chinese, we used to live in china, I myself speak mandarin fluently and we're moving back to Asia, but aside from personal reasons or reasons because you want to learn another language don't see why schools here should make it mandatory. And if it's already offered in yr 5/6 at Goodrich then that's great.

  • 1 month later...

I am in Year 11 at Haberdasher Aske's Hatcham College and study GCSE Mandarin. I have almost completed the the GCSE and have achieved A*s in my speaking and writing exams, I am yet to take my reading and writing exams but my school have predicted me an A* overall. I'm going to continue Higher Level Chinese at Dartford Grammar School out of pure interest.

If you're a linguist, or polyglot should I say then even the reading and writing won't be too difficult. I grew up speaking Yoruba a language that shares the same phonology and SVP syntax as Mandarin so I haven't found Mandarin speaking difficult at all. I'm an avid learner or languages so I choose to adapt to the writing style with ease but I do agree that for children in the primary phase a language like Mandarin shouldn't be mandatory. Not all of them will be lucky enough to speak a similar language already like I did it's almost pointless. I went to China for the entire summer last year and the city folk insist on speaking 'my language' English to me -_- I can't even speak Mandarin in restaurants down here they're all Cantonese.

Learning a European language like Spanish has been far more rewarding and useful for me but I still love Mandarin it's a very beautiful and culturally rich language.


*Rant over*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...