Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Medley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hardly Tory privatisation Sue


xxxxxxx


Forgive me if I'm wrong, but if memory serves Labour came to power in 1997?


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/london-buses-to-be-privatised-next-year-1561527.html


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatisation_of_London_bus_services

Hope you can mention the extension of route 63 in this meeting, Renata - it would plug several gaps.



Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm meeting Val Shawcross (GLA) this afternoon at

> 3pm at Honor Oak Park Station to

> discuss/investigate the problems with the buses in

> the area.

> Renata

  • 2 weeks later...
Normally when new Transport hubs open other public transport is realigned to make the most of it. Yet when the London Ovwerground opened at Honor Oak As far As I know NOTHING was changed. Sure either extending a brockly bus to Peckham or the 63 to HOnor Oak station is so obvious that any traffic integrator would do it as a matter ofcourse. I would certainly use it if there was bus there. The hill and my Arhritus wont let me use it at the moment.

Integrated transport? But this is Britain!





the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Normally when new Transport hubs open other public

> transport is realigned to make the most of it. Yet

> when the London Ovwerground opened at Honor Oak As

> far As I know NOTHING was changed. Sure either

> extending a brockly bus to Peckham or the 63 to

> HOnor Oak station is so obvious that any traffic

> integrator would do it as a matter ofcourse. I

> would certainly use it if there was bus there. The

> hill and my Arhritus wont let me use it at the

> moment.

We live at the end of Dunstans Road and use Honor Oak Park every day (I work in Canary Wharf, my partner near London Bridge). It's only a 15-20 minute walk, but even for relatively young, fit people that hill can be painful! An extension to the 63 route would certainly make our lives much easier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...