Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This route was retendered as part of Transport for London tranche 339 with consultation starting in February 2009.


Input from Southwark residents, councillors and officers meant we asked for the route to call into Sainsbury's on Dog Kennel Hill. TfL rejected this as it would make the journey less direct, lengthen the journey and overall increase the subsidy costs.


What they did agree to was including longer buses as an option in the tendering process. In October 2010 Abellio was awarded the contract (previous operator London Central) on condition new buses were used.


The most recent communication from TfL Buses to Southwark in February confirmed the new operator and buses would start in March.


Clearly they've made a great start.


If you ever have concerns about particular bus routes do let local councillors know. We raise issues with council officers who are in regular contact with TfL so when bus route contracts come up for retendering they have lots of feedback to give TfL. Council transport officers also check with councillors what inputs and views we hold before submitting the councils input to TfL.

Hi dreaminofsleep,

The timetable is a little better.

The new buses are E200 darts/Enviro200 9.3m long rather than previous EL2000-Dart DELs which were 9.0m long. The extra doors should make it much easier for people to get on and of the buses.

The previous contract had 11 buses with one being kept as a spare.

The new contract has 12 buses with presumably one being kept as a spare as well.

With the extra doors it should be slightly easier to stick to the timetable.


NB. I'm not a bus spotter but my curiosity was aroused!



Hi Nero,

The P13 was only recontracted a couple of years ago and isn't due to be retendered for some time. Only way to effect change on that is some evidence of overcrowding.

Oh very funny MP.

FWIW James Barber, if there were any joined up thinking with government and (bus) companies then they would be forced to go to Sainsburys because if they did I might not use my motorcycle so often to go shopping.


Nahhhhhhhh you're right, riding a bike for any reason including shopping is good reason enough.


But you get my point I am sure...!

I got on the new 484 Wednesday evening and it was nice to see the new bus but felt horrible for the poor woman with the driver shutting the door virtually in her face, and drive off.


Seems like the new buses come with at least one young-ish driver with a nasty attitude.

A sweeping generalisation I know, but I think a lot of these bus drivers are on a bit of a power trip and simply take pleasure in causing misery where possible.


I've experienced and witnessed plenty of occasions where they see you running for the bus, you get there just in time and they decide to quickly close the doors and pull off! Or, simply decide they don't want to stop the bus and let you on, especially when the bus is half empty! Plus, it seems that they have no respect or empathy for mothers with pushchairs, pregnant women rushing for the bus or even decent kids just trying to get to school and back (they all get tarred with the unruly school children brush).


Sometimes they're just so rude it's unbelievable. Totally unnecessary and lacking any kind of customer service. A lot of the time I think they just get back what they put out!


Thank goodness I'm not having to use the 484 regularly at the mo as it is usually an absolute nightmare!

What on earth has happened to the 484 timetable?

I waited 20 mins for a bus at Lewisham station on Saturday, then 25 mins at Dog Kennel hill on Monday.

My daughter has been late for college twice this week, missing the train at ED station, because of having

to wait too long for a bus.

Whereas before, there used to be two 343's to every one 484 running along the back of Peckham Rye park, this

week there have been around four 343's to one 484!

They might be nice new buses, but I think I prefer the old ones with the original, more reliable operator.

Waited 20 mins or so for a 484 home from lewisham market this afternoon. I suspect there may have been rather longer gap between buses, as most of the seats were already taken by the time it pulled up. Then again, there are fewer seats in the new buses as they've made way for the rear doors.


In theory the rear doors are a very good thing, providing the driver knows how to use them. They seem to have two speeds: The first opening is the fast one which was never long enough to allow everyone off. They were then re-opened in slow-motion to release the rest of those waiting to disembark.


Things got a tad more lively at Brockley Cross when the opening front doors managed to trap a woman, who was trying to get her bags off the rack, against the hand rail. Bizarrely, the driver didn't do anything and it took a passenger standing nearby to release her by forcing the door back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...