Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Come to think of it. Surely nom de plume is not the correct term for your name on an internet forum? (I know I was the one to bring it up) I think nom de clavier would be more fitting. (or is my french completely off there?)


Well the correct term is Handle or Username but this is East Dulwich and we wouldn?t want to offend Dulwichmum with plebeian language now would we.

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's 9 out of 1,100 isn't it?

>

> What's that as a percentage?


Hmm fair enough, but add up the combined posts (in fact, just mine and Piers' will do), and you'll have a much higher percentage of he total posts. How many of those 1,100 have posted on here?


PS. DM, I just smoke homegrown... Silver Rizla anyone?

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey - I've just checked mine 359, well now 360.

> ::o Only registered at the end of April. Time to

> go cold turkey me thinks.


360? You don't know your born love... This is my 2,906th!!!!!!


I really need to get a more interesting job! :-$

Lots of Forums classify their users according to how many posts they have made. What would the categories for this forum be? Perhpas if we narrowed it down to posts made during working hours it would be as follows:


0-100 Busy Person

100-500 Occasionally Busy Person

500-1000 Not busy enough

1000-2000 Unemployed/Soon to be fired

2000 + Keef, MP, SeanMcG

All your thoughts on this echo mine so closely I?m getting depressed.


Right what to do next? Do some writing, perhaps even for work? Browse the Guardian Jobs website? Check the EDF? Sit here and daydream about beer and cigarettes? Do all that boring administration I?ve been putting off for weeks?


I?ll think about it on a trip to the coffee machine. Mochachino anyone?

capt_birdseye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lots of Forums classify their users according to

> how many posts they have made. What would the

> categories for this forum be? Perhpas if we

> narrowed it down to posts made during working

> hours it would be as follows:

>

> 0-100 Busy Person

> 100-500 Occasionally Busy Person

> 500-1000 Not busy enough

> 1000-2000 Unemployed/Soon to be fired

> 2000 + Keef, MP, SeanMcG



I hope these aren't right, as I seem to have crept past the 1,000 mark without noticing.

OHMYGOD!!!


You have returned!!!


I need to lie down, I can feel one of my heads coming on...


You made my heart skip a beat when I say you signed in - but first let me explain!


I am a working mother - did I not say? I thought we were at The Penthouse together? I thought we understood eachother? I feel sure that we have met!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...