Jump to content

Dulwich PIcture Gallery Cafe moan


womanofdulwich

Recommended Posts

The food here is good- but the service is so surly and rude. We ordered earl grey pot for 2 today and after we poured it and tasted it we realised it was english breakfast tea- and only one teabag and smaller than the next table's pot for 2 - and was a pot for one. when we complained they gave us another pot but with one tea bag in- we complained again and they took it away and returned it but not one sorry to be heard. WHy cant staff be more gracious?

Take me back to Las Vegas, where service is service not something that has to be done by reluctant staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've definately gone off this place too, I went a couple of Sundays ago for tea and cake, it was quarter to 12, and too early for lunch for me. They turned us away because even though they had cakes on display they were only serving people eating lunch. What I don't understand is they had quite a few empty tables, why refuse my money?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could always try the lovely cafe in Dulwich Park .

Although if you go before 4pm the scrummage will put you off and they'll have run out of basics like chips and white bread hours ago .

If you go after 4pm you'll find half the seating closed off and drinks and food served in and off paper cups and plates .

Well they're doing you a favour aren't they ,remaining (seemingly under duress ) open and relieving you of your money ?

What more do you want ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dulwich Park cafe is an absolute disgrace. Have never ever not had to queue for 10 mins. Many people only want to buy a hot drink.


They could have a concession for coffee sitting alongside the cafe allowing the cafe to concentrate on food, but I guess Dulwich Estate would not allow this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are strict planning controls in place in the village that limit the number of commercial premises. So that will always strangle diversity and choice. As 'Nette says you'll also have a captive audience - all of the places in the village are overcrowded at weekends (the dog, pizza express, park cafe) so they don't have to try with the service either. A shame really given the rest of the village is a near perfect example of progressive conservation.


I reckon a fair few villagers just pop down to ED anyway....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lucas is worse than the Gallery cafe in my opinion, but I'd like to give Au Ciel a special mention for arsiness on a number of occasions - I've often left with the impression they don't want my sort in there. With the cafe in the park I think it's more a lack of organisation, though I agree that place has huge potential if only they could see it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...