Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For fuxache: here, for the hard of Googling, is your friendly rundown of the current, untrue and scurrilous internet rumours.


Ryan Giggs is rumoured to have had three bits on the side on the go, all are injuncted, only Imogen Thomas' name has been made public so far.


Hugh Bonneville is rumoured to have paid for sex with the same woman as had a paid for threesome with Wayne Rooney.


Fred the Shred was at it with someone at RBS.


Alan Shearer is rumoured to have been nodding one in at Gabby Logan's (nee Yorath) back post, or something.



While everyone else is looking this way ('famous people having sex', wedding, calm down dear,) >(double dip, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Entire Met Police on Rupe's payroll etc)

JJF wrote

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Why can't Imogen whateverhernameis just walk about with his footy shirt on to reveal him? She's only banned from SPEAKING about him, right?


Interesting Idea but DJKQ is right it takes two but she is the one under fire why should he get way with it and go on pretending to be the model husband and family man.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Put a gagging order on her. She was gagging for it

> anyway. And so was he. Maybe they weren't getting

> enough at home. Gotta keep the home fires burning.

> Nudge nudge wink wink. No what I mean squire.



(6) !!!!

Yahira Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Put a gagging order on her. She was gagging for

> it

> > anyway. And so was he. Maybe they weren't

> getting

> > enough at home. Gotta keep the home fires

> burning.

> > Nudge nudge wink wink. No what I mean squire.

>

>

> (6) !!!!



:)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree but she should know what she's getting

> herself into.


And think of her "career", I mean how's a girl to earn her crust?


I know, maybe a new magazine called "Goodbye" instead of "Hello"



N(?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...