Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Legal commentary on "finders keepers" etc.


Personal anecdote -- about 30 years ago my handbag fell off my bag (not properly secured obviously). The person who found it handed it in to the police and I got it back. About 40 years ago as a very young person I left my purse on the bus with my week's wages in it (?11 :)) and the person who found it handed it in and I got it back.


I can feel very fond of the human race. They can be very caring and careful for others,


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8129534.stm

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is no note and someone takes it, it is technically Theft.

> Simples.

...

> You your child leaves their micro scooter outside your house and someone takes it , it is theft.

> No argument.


How do you reach those conclusions?

It is indeed theft by finding


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft_by_finding


http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/28/when-are-you-legally-allowed-to-keep-money-you-find-on-the-floor-6479579/


You're supposed to make an attempt to return to the owner (even if it's a five pound note). So if you take something abandoned in the street with the intention of handing it in to the police (or telling this forum) then it probably isn't theft as you want to make an effort to return it.

kibris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You left it in the street - your fault.If it was

> left inside the gate then you could say it was

> theft. But as you left it outside and more like

> your front door was closed then its not theft.


So if you go to the shops and leave a pram or your bike outside and some one takes it, it is not theft. ?


Don't be an ar*e. Of course it is theft.


DulwichFox

Not to side-track from this interesting thread, we had a box of fruit/veg "taken" from our front porch area Sunday morning. I would venture to say someone coming in through our gate and "taking" the box, which was outside our house, was indeed theft. Very disappointing. Sorry the cam was not yet installed to capture the culprit. I wonder if they made their get-away by micro scooter.

The link to the video doesn't work - is it still there?


Oh and even without seeing it, it clearly sounds like theft: Intention to permanently deprive

Kids leave their stuff outside their homes all the time...doesn't give anyone the right to take it without asking or without express permission.

It's theft.


People need to get off their high horses.


Just because we don't live in Frinkley Bottom, where people leave their doors open at night, doesn't mean we should always be on guard for thievery.


Question for those saying it isn't theft, would you have taken it?

If yes, you're as bad as the scooter thief and shoplifters!

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all fairness, I agree with both Alice and

> Abdabs.

>

> Further, I'm a bit surprised by your implicit

> threat towards the woman who took it... not sure

> what you plan on doing with the high definition

> recording?

>

> There is a common theme of leaving things outside

> your house that you want collected and fair-doos

> to the woman.

>

> Insulting Alice has probably lost you any goodwill

> that might have come your way.



Shoplifter.

I think it's all in the positioning. I often leave things outside on my wall for people to take and they usually go within a very short time.


Of course I wouldn't have taken it, but they OP had said it was left outside and there is clearly some ambiguity in how this was positioned.


It's usually very clear if something is left for taking.


However, theft if rife and we should all look after our possessions.

Gloves Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's theft.

>

> People need to get off their high horses.

>

> Just because we don't live in Frinkley Bottom,

> where people leave their doors open at night,

> doesn't mean we should always be on guard for

> thievery.

>

> Question for those saying it isn't theft, would

> you have taken it?

> If yes, you're as bad as the scooter thief and

> shoplifters!


There is a 'thing' of people taking things left on the street - especially if near/in bins.


But using common sense you get a feeling for things that haven't been left to take and a court would have that feeling too (a scooter near the gateway of a house - my common sense says not to take unless to return).

People are being a bit mean to ED Moots. C'mon now, it's a kid's scooter, they're probably distraught. He/she didn't say it in a mean way - in fact, it just sounded informative, letting the lady know that it belonged to someone and wasn't a giveaway. And that they'd pick it up. Calm down, folks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...