Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please be careful everyone

Was gonna write a whole load of details and information about it but my blood boils every time

My mum is not young and she is not well in the first place , and this has resulted in my mum having a stroke and being in hospital she is now Not the same person

I will prob come by tomorrow and give more details about the actual incident

Promise if I find the person I?m guaranteed to get a life sentence

MAIN THING IM HERE IS TO TELL EVERY ELDERLY LADY AND WOMAN DISTRACTED WALKING WITH THERE CHILDREN TO PLEASE WATCH OUT NO JOKE HONESTLY THIS CRAP HAS ALMOST TOOK MY MUMS LIFE!!

Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the

> title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I

> beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in

> this thread.


I disagree. I think someone is entitled to pass on the details/description of someone who has attacked their mother. I suspect that those are all the details that his mother has which he is passing on (although it would probably be more useful to know where, geographically, this took place). I'd expect the same to be passed on if they were white.


Hope your mum recovers soon Peckhamguy.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.


Interesting that you don't object to the identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist of you.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interesting that you don't object to the

> identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> of you.


There has to be some form of identifying noun and the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man. Throwing in "black" for no reason that I can see does look rather odd. Sure the OP was just writing quickly when upset and did not have any racist intentions, but it does look odd, just as it would if it said "tall man," "short woman" or whatever. Given the number of black people living in this area I don't think the argument that it in any way helps identify the perpetrator holds any water.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > Interesting that you don't object to the

> > identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> > of you.

>

> There has to be some form of identifying noun and

> the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man.


Really? They could have used 'person', which is the real baseline.


But that is irrelevant to my point. I just found it interesting that ollieloudon saw one piece of supposed discrimination in the OP's description, but not the other. I thought it said a lot about ollieloudon specifically and what some sections of society see as 'acceptable' discrimination in general.

El Presidente Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have actually reached the point where in the

> eyes of some, accurately describing an individuals

> appearance is racist.


To be fair, a few years ago on here it was pretty immediate. At least this one took over a week before it descended into that sort of crap.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes , me too, but you can always rely on

> rendelharris to do the libtard thing...


Ugh, please don't use that Americanism. 'Liberal' and 'left-wing' are very different (though not completely mutually exclusive)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I hate the idea of someone with a genuine disability losing money, it's heart-breaking. I thought the whole idea of these cuts was to get kids with mental health issues, which we used to call 'the human condition', off benefits and into a job. Before anyone says anything, I'm not talking about people with severe autism.  If the tests are so astringent, Spartacus, how come healthy youngsters with anxiety are getting benefits? It's ludicrous.  This from The Times:  Then there is mental health. This is the fastest-growing category of claim; anxiety and depression is now the single biggest reason to claim PIPs, accounting for 16 per cent of spending. Including problems such as autism and ADHD, there are 1.4 million people claiming for “psychiatric disorders”, almost 40 per cent of the total.   NHS figures on Thursday found that 23 per cent of people of working age now have a mental disorder, up from 18 per cent a decade ago, rising to 26 per cent in 16 to 24 year-olds. Young people are most likely to claim benefits for mental health problems and there is growing concern about a generation who may do so for decades. The number of children on disability living allowance, the precursor to PIPs, will reach a million by the end of the decade, double pre-Covid levels. Most of these are for behavioural problems such as ADHD or learning disabilities  
    • I don't think anyone wants people who need support not to have it.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...